Do EMET and TRFM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, EMET or TRFM?

EMET has 10% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TRFM has 47%, so EMET differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, EMET or TRFM?

EMET charges 0.62% a year and TRFM charges 0.49%, so TRFM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

EMET vs TRFM: which is really different?

EMET and TRFM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMET returned +32.7% over the year. VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF and AAM Transformers ETF.

10.5%

EMET in the S&P 500

46.8%

TRFM in the S&P 500

+32.7%

EMET total return, 1 year

+22.2%

TRFM total return, 1 year

EMET · 1 year to Sep 30, 202690% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

11% of EMET's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index

TRFM · 1 year to Sep 30, 202653% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of TRFM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · EMET scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

EMET 78.3

TRFM 9.6

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMET and TRFM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding EMET TRFM

Only in EMET

Anglo American Plc 8.53%

Freeport-Mcmoran Inc 8.26%

Grupo Mexico Sab De Cv 7.32%

Teck Resources Ltd 6.84%

Antofagasta Plc 4.82%

Southern Copper Corp 4.75%

Valterra Platinum Ltd 3.56%

Boliden Ab 3.44%

Only in TRFM

Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.14%

Bloom Energy Corp 1.14%

Sandisk Corp/DE 1.13%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 1.03%

Marvell Technology Inc 1.00%

Ciena Corp 0.97%

Western Digital Corp 0.96%

Texas Instruments Inc 0.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	EMET	TRFM	EMET	TRFM	EMET	TRFM
3 months	+4.2%	−5.0%	+1.6 pts	−7.5 pts	+2.0 pts	−7.2 pts
6 months	+0.3%	+24.8%	−16.7 pts	+7.8 pts	−26.6 pts	−2.1 pts
1 year	+32.7%	+22.2%	+17.0 pts	+6.5 pts	+8.9 pts	−1.6 pts
3 years	+75.1%	+119.6%	−9.9 pts	+34.6 pts	−34.9 pts	+9.6 pts
Since launch EMET Nov 2021 · TRFM Jul 2022	+27.8%	+150.8%	−48.1 pts	+39.0 pts	−67.3 pts	−14.3 pts

EMET and TRFM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EMET

VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF · Holds 59 stocks in copper, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

TRFM

AAM Transformers ETF · Holds 310 stocks in electrification and the grid, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck AAM

Theme Copper Electrification and the grid

In the S&P 500 10.5% 46.8%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 79.2%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 27.5%

Holdings 59 310

Top ten, share of the fund 54.0% 8.1%

Expense ratio 0.62% 0.49%

Fee for the differing part 0.62% 0.62%

Total return, 1 year +32.7% +22.2%

vs the S&P 500 +17.0 pts +6.5 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +8.9 pts −1.6 pts

Below its high −15.5% −6.4%

Net assets $35m $248m

EMET and TRFM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EMET in plain words

By weight, 10% of EMET's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 17.0 pts. It sits 15.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

TRFM in plain words

By weight, 47% of TRFM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 79%. The top ten holdings are 8% of the fund across 310 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts. It sits 6.4% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do EMET and TRFM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, EMET or TRFM?: EMET has 10% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TRFM has 47%, so EMET differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, EMET or TRFM?: EMET charges 0.62% a year and TRFM charges 0.49%, so TRFM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

EMET vs FPWR EMET vs GRID EMET vs ICOP EMET vs JOUL TRFM vs VOLT TRFM vs ZAP TRFM vs COPA TRFM vs GRID

EMET on its own →TRFM on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

EMET filings on SEC EDGAR ↗EMET prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗TRFM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TRFM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗AAM website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, EMET against TRFM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/emet-vs-trfm

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.