IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

EMET vs KWH: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

EMET and KWH hold 4% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMET and KWH

Net assets: $30m on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF, and $58m on Aug 31, 2026 for GMO Power Infrastructure ETF.

EMET on its own →KWH on its own →
At a glance
10.6%
EMET in the S&P 500
41.4%
KWH in the S&P 500
+22.9%
EMET total return, 1 year
−6.1%
KWH total return, since launch, Jul 15, 2026
EMET · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 89% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of EMET's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 56% of the fund · 59 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of EMET's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

11% of EMET's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

KWH · 3 months to Nov 4, 2026 59% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of KWH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.41%59%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 31% of the fund · 74 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of KWH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.41%59%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 97% · Nasdaq-100: 5% in

41% of KWH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

KWH costs 0.02 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

EMET vs KWH: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureEMETKWH
Return
Total return, 1 year+22.9%not published
Drawdown
Below its all-time high24.9%, high on Feb 27, 20268.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksCopperElectrification and the grid
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 7.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.62%0.60%
Net assets, EMET as of Nov 3, 2026 and KWH as of Aug 31, 2026$30m$58m
Holdings
Holdings in common4%

Method

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, EMET and KWH hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMET KWH
Freeport-Mcmoran Inc 8.39% 1.24%
Anglo American Plc 9.10% 1.16%
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 1.69% 0.88%
Albemarle Corp 2.22% 0.84%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMET
Grupo Mexico Sab De Cv 7.99%
Teck Resources Ltd 7.39%
Southern Copper Corp 4.73%
Antofagasta Plc 4.68%
Boliden Ab 3.92%
Valterra Platinum Ltd 3.47%
Lundin Mining Corp 3.17%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 3.13%
Only in KWH
Schneider Electric SE 5.14%
Siemens AG 4.68%
Eaton Corp PLC 3.43%
Trane Technologies PLC 2.69%
Enel SpA 2.52%
NextEra Energy Inc 2.52%
Iberdrola SA 2.51%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S 2.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: EMET vs KWH: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowEMETKWHEMETKWH
3 months−13.8%−6.7%−12.5 pts vs ACWInot measured
6 months−18.9%–−21.5 pts vs ACWI–
1 year+22.9%–+7.9 pts vs ACWI–
3 years+70.2%–−7.4 pts vs ACWI–
Since launchNot the same days: EMET Nov 2021 · KWH Jul 2026+13.6%−6.1%−49.0 pts vs ACWInot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

EMET VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF · Holds 59 stocks in copper, 11% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWH GMO Power Infrastructure ETF · Holds 74 stocks in electrification and the grid, 41% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VanEck GMO
Theme Copper Electrification and the grid
In the S&P 500 10.6% 41.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 96.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 4.9%
Holdings 59 74
Top ten, share of the fund 56.2% 30.8%
Expense ratio 0.62% 0.60%
Fee for the differing part 0.62% 0.62%
Total return, 1 year +22.9% −6.1% (since launch, Jul 15, 2026)
vs its benchmark +7.9 pts vs ACWI not measured
Below its high −24.9% −8.5%
Net assets, EMET as of Nov 3, 2026 and KWH as of Aug 31, 2026 $30m $58m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

EMET flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMET

By weight, 11% of EMET's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 7.9 pts. It sits 24.9% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

KWH

By weight, 41% of KWH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 31% of the fund across 74 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Jul 15, 2026 the fund returned −6.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 8.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do EMET and KWH hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, EMET or KWH?
EMET has 11% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWH has 41%, so EMET differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, EMET or KWH?
EMET charges 0.62% a year and KWH charges 0.60%, so KWH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
EMET vs JOULEMET vs TPZEMET vs ELFYEMET vs TRFMKWH vs ICOPKWH vs COPAKWH vs COPJKWH vs COPP
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →EMET on its own →KWH on its own →EMET dividend history →EMET holdings →KWH holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
EMET filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
EMET prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
VanEck website ↗
KWH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
KWH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
GMO website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMET against KWH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/emet-vs-kwh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.