Data as of .
COPX vs ITA: which is really different?
ITA holds 79.5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and COPX 4.8%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: COPX scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and ITA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in ITA |
|---|---|
| HUDBAY MINERALS INC 5.46% | GE AEROSPACE 21.81% |
| TECK RESOURCES LTD-CLS B 5.29% | RTX 17.21% |
| FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD 5.12% | BOEING 9.36% |
| BHP GROUP LTD 5.02% | GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.82% |
| GLENCORE PLC 4.99% | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 4.69% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SA 4.86% | NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 4.44% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 4.84% | TRANSDIGM GROUP 4.31% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 4.79% | HOWMET AEROSPACE 4.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | ITA | COPX | ITA | COPX | ITA | |
| 3 months | +3.3% | −6.3% | 0.0 pts | −9.6 pts | +4.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 6 months | +16.3% | −4.4% | +0.3 pts | −20.4 pts | −4.4 pts | −25.1 pts |
| 1 year | +71.5% | +10.0% | +54.0 pts | −7.5 pts | +48.5 pts | −13.0 pts |
| 3 years | +152.5% | +103.7% | +74.7 pts | +25.8 pts | +57.5 pts | +8.6 pts |
| Since launch | +184.2% | +906.7% | −560.2 pts | +102.3 pts | −1369.2 pts | −767.2 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF Holds 41 stocks in electrification and the grid, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF Holds 51 stocks in defense, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 4.8% | 79.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 97.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Holdings | 41 | 51 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 49.4% | 77.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.37% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.38% |
| Total return, 1 year | +71.5% | +10.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +54.0 pts | −7.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +48.5 pts | −13.0 pts |
| Below its high | −8.2% | −13.5% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +71.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 54.0 pts. It sits 8.2% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
ITA in plain words
By weight, 80% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 78% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +10.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. It sits 13.5% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or ITA?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ITA has 80%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or ITA?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and ITA charges 0.37%, so ITA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against ITA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copx-vs-ita Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.