IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CNBS vs MSOS: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

CNBS and MSOS are compared on the fields both publish, and over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MSOS returned +3.6% against −2.5%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CNBS and MSOS

Net assets: $70m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, and $807m on Nov 4, 2026 for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF.

CNBS on its own →MSOS on its own →
At a glance
CNBS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Holdings are gross exposure, not a portfolio
Holdings are gross exposure, not a portfolioCNBS's holdings are gross exposure rather than a portfolio, so no S&P 500 share is published. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.holdings not yet filedHoldings are gross exposure, not a portfolioCNBS's holdings are gross exposure rather than a portfolio, so no S&P 500 share is published. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.holdings not yet filed

CNBS's holdings are gross exposure rather than a portfolio, so no S&P 500 share is published. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

MSOS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 6 positions, 26% of its net assets
6 positions, 26% of its net assetsMSOS holds 6 positions, 26% of its net assets. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 26% of the fund · 6 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in6 positions, 26% of its net assetsMSOS holds 6 positions, 26% of its net assets. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

MSOS holds 6 positions, 26% of its net assets. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

MSOS costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points; MSOS is 11.9 times larger.

CNBS vs MSOS: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCNBSMSOS
Return
Total return, 1 year−2.5%+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high92.3%, high on Feb 10, 202192.1%, high on Feb 10, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksCannabisCannabis
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.76%0.75%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$70m$830m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: CNBS vs MSOS: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowCNBSMSOS
3 months+4.0%+7.2%
6 months−18.3%−17.8%
1 year−2.5%+3.6%
3 years−19.5%−26.4%
Since launchNot the same days: CNBS Jul 2019 · MSOS Sep 2020−87.2%−82.4%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF · Holds 34 stocks in cannabis MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF · Holds 6 stocks in cannabis, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Amplify AdvisorShares
Theme Cannabis Cannabis
In the S&P 500 not published 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 not published 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 not published 0.0%
Holdings 34 6
Top ten, share of the fund not published 25.8%
Expense ratio 0.76% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part not published 0.75%
Total return, 1 year −2.5% +3.6%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −92.3% −92.1%
Net assets, CNBS as of Nov 3, 2026 and MSOS as of Nov 4, 2026 $70m $807m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

CNBS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CNBS

CNBS holds 34 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026, and the book is gross exposure rather than a portfolio. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 92.3% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.

MSOS

By weight, 0% of MSOS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 26% of the fund across 6 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 92.1% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CNBS or MSOS?
CNBS charges 0.76% a year and MSOS charges 0.75%, so MSOS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CNBS vs MJCNBS vs YOLOCNBS vs WEEDMSOS vs YOLOMSOS vs WEEDMSOS vs MJ
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CNBS on its own →MSOS on its own →CNBS dividend history →CNBS holdings →MSOS holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CNBS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CNBS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Amplify page for CNBS ↗
MSOS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
MSOS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
AdvisorShares page for MSOS ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CNBS against MSOS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cnbs-vs-msos

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.