Data as of .
CNBS vs MSOS: which is really different?
CNBS and MSOS hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and MSOS returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: CNBS scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
38% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CNBS and MSOS hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CNBS | MSOS |
|---|---|---|
| Curaleaf Holdings Inc | 15.98% | 47.70% |
| Trulieve Cannabis Corp | 13.75% | 37.00% |
| TERRASCEND CORP | 4.54% | 10.45% |
| GLASS HOUSE BRANDS INC | 6.28% | 3.60% |
| Only in CNBS | Only in MSOS |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 34.38% | VILLAGE FARMS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.20% |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 23.06% | FLUENT CORP 0.04% |
| GREEN THUMB INDS INC 13.53% | |
| TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP 10.69% | |
| VERANO HLDGS CORP 7.44% | |
| CRESCO LABS INC 6.08% | |
| CURALEAF HLDGS 4.85% | |
| Innovative Industrial Properties Inc 2.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBS | MSOS | CNBS | MSOS | CNBS | MSOS | |
| 3 months | −2.6% | −1.8% | −4.9 pts | −4.0 pts | −0.2 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +27.4% | +36.1% | +9.4 pts | +18.1 pts | +3.2 pts | +11.9 pts |
| 1 year | +1.4% | +7.5% | −15.2 pts | −9.1 pts | −20.4 pts | −14.3 pts |
| 3 years | −31.2% | −39.7% | −109.6 pts | −118.1 pts | −129.3 pts | −137.8 pts |
| Since launch | −85.5% | −80.1% | −267.6 pts | −211.9 pts | −374.4 pts | −227.0 pts |
| CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF Holds 39 stocks in cannabis, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF Holds 6 stocks in cannabis, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | AdvisorShares |
| Theme | Cannabis | Cannabis |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 39 | 6 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 136.0% | 100.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.76% | 0.78% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.76% | 0.78% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.4% | +7.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −15.2 pts | −9.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −20.4 pts | −14.3 pts |
| Below its high | −91.3% | −91.1% |
| Net assets | $78m | $967m |
CNBS in plain words
By weight, 0% of CNBS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 136% of the fund across 39 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 21, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +1.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. It sits 91.3% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
MSOS in plain words
By weight, 0% of MSOS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 6 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. It sits 91.1% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do CNBS and MSOS hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 38% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CNBS or MSOS?
- CNBS has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MSOS has 0%, so CNBS differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CNBS or MSOS?
- CNBS charges 0.76% a year and MSOS charges 0.78%, so CNBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CNBS against MSOS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cnbs-vs-msos Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.