IQ

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

CGPT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+4.3 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: CGPT ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.25 pts
A year: CGPT 0.75%, LUMA 1.00%, per filings dated Jul 8, 2026 and Jul 30, 2026
Overlap
4%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

CGPT costs 0.25 points a year less; LUMA is 9.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CGPT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCGPTLUMA
Drawdown
Below its all-time high27.6%, high on Sep 22, 202633.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksAI infrastructure and chipsAI infrastructure and chips
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%1.00%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026$1.1m$10m
Holdings
Holdings in common4%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58%55%

Method

Key numbers
24.9%
CGPT in the S&P 500
19.4%
LUMA in the S&P 500
−24.7%
CGPT total return, 3 months
−23.5%
LUMA total return, since launch, Jul 15, 2026
CGPT · 3 months to Nov 12, 2026 75% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of CGPT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.25%75%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 59% of the fund · 11 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 33% in75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of CGPT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.25%75%inoutside the S&P 500active share 86% · Nasdaq-100: 33% in

25% of CGPT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

LUMA · 3 months to Nov 12, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 55% of the fund · 27 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 11, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

19% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, CGPT and LUMA hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGPT LUMA
Marvell Technology Inc 3.90% 3.84%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGPT
Cerebras Systems Inc 9.02%
Credo Technology Group Holding 8.08%
Astera Labs Inc 7.92%
NVIDIA Corp 7.32%
Micron Technology Inc 4.68%
SK hynix Inc 4.64%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.50%
Broadcom Inc 4.50%
Only in LUMA
AYAR LABS INC 9.61%
COHERENT CORP 5.72%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H 5.72%
AIXTRON SE 5.65%
LAND MARK OPTOELECTRONICS 5.31%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 4.74%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC L-A 4.71%
TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD 4.61%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CGPT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowCGPTLUMACGPTLUMA
3 months−24.7%−29.0%not measured−20.7 pts vs EEM
Since launchNot the same days: CGPT Aug 2026 · LUMA Jul 2026−24.7%−23.5%not measured−16.7 pts vs EEM

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CGPT VegaShares AI Inference ETF · Holds 11 stocks in aI infrastructure and chips, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies LUMA KraneShares Photonic and Optical ETF · Holds 27 stocks in aI infrastructure and chips, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VegaShares KraneShares
Theme AI infrastructure and chips AI infrastructure and chips
In the S&P 500 24.9% 19.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 86.0% 99.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 32.8% 8.6%
Holdings 11 27
Top ten, share of the fund 58.5% 54.7%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.00%
Fee for the differing part 0.87% 1.01%
Total return, 1 year −24.7% (since launch, Aug 13, 2026) −23.5% (since launch, Jul 15, 2026)
vs its benchmark not measured −16.7 pts vs EEM (since launch, Jul 15, 2026)
Below its high −27.6% −33.8%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 $1.1m $10m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

CGPT and LUMA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGPT

By weight, 25% of CGPT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 11 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Aug 13, 2026 the fund returned −24.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 27.6% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2026.

LUMA

By weight, 19% of LUMA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 27 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 11, 2026. Since it first traded on Jul 15, 2026 the fund returned −23.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.8% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CGPT and LUMA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CGPT or LUMA?
CGPT has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LUMA has 19%, so LUMA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CGPT or LUMA?
CGPT charges 0.75% a year and LUMA charges 1.00%, so CGPT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CGPT vs IVEPCGPT vs COOLCGPT vs CHPXCGPT vs AINFLUMA vs TCAILUMA vs CHPXLUMA vs COOLLUMA vs AINF
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CGPT on its own →LUMA on its own →CGPT holdings →LUMA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
CGPT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
CGPT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
VegaShares page for CGPT ↗
LUMA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
LUMA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
KraneShares page for LUMA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGPT against LUMA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cgpt-vs-luma

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

CGPT and LUMA hold 4% of their weight in the same names.

CGPT on its own →LUMA on its own →
Growth of 100

CGPT and LUMA

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

CGPT −24.7%LUMA −29.0%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

CGPT −24.7%, LUMA −29.0%: CGPT +4.3 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.