CBOT vs HUMN: which is really different?
CBOT and HUMN hold 12% of their weight in the same names. Corgi Robots & Humanoids ETF and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF.
51% of CBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index
11% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CBOT and HUMN hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
12% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
12% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CBOT | HUMN | CBOT | HUMN | CBOT | HUMN |
| 3 months | −8.3% | −16.5% | −10.8 pts | −19.0 pts | −10.4 pts | −18.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −0.5% | not published | −17.4 pts | not published | −27.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −2.8% | not published | −18.6 pts | not published | −26.6 pts |
| Since launch CBOT May 2026 · HUMN Jun 2025 | −11.1% | +16.0% | −15.6 pts | −10.4 pts | −17.7 pts | −20.3 pts |
CBOT and HUMN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CBOT and HUMN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CBOT in plain words
By weight, 50% of CBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −11.1% with distributions reinvested against +4.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.6 pts. It sits 14.2% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.
HUMN in plain words
By weight, 11% of HUMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CBOT and HUMN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CBOT against HUMN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-humn
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CBOT against HUMN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-humn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CBOT against HUMN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-humn
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CBOT against HUMN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-humn
- Markdown
- [CBOT against HUMN (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-humn)