Data as of .
BUYZ vs TMAT: which is really different?
BUYZ and TMAT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and TMAT returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: TMAT scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BUYZ and TMAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BUYZ | Only in TMAT |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC 11.18% | VICOR CORP 2.98% |
| SHOPIFY INC 8.57% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.81% |
| APPLOVIN CORP 5.39% | LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.75% |
| ALPHABET INC 4.08% | CIENA CORP 2.61% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.95% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 2.55% |
| CARVANA COMPANY 3.70% | CLEAR SECURE INC 2.48% |
| DOORDASH INC 3.35% | KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.26% |
| EBAY INC 3.32% | MODINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1.94% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | TMAT | BUYZ | TMAT | BUYZ | TMAT | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | −5.8% | −0.4 pts | −8.1 pts | +4.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +7.8% | +21.2% | −10.2 pts | +3.1 pts | −16.4 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 1 year | −22.6% | +3.5% | −39.1 pts | −13.0 pts | −44.3 pts | −18.2 pts |
| 3 years | +36.9% | +105.6% | −41.5 pts | +27.2 pts | −61.3 pts | +7.4 pts |
| Since launch | +42.6% | +16.5% | −140.3 pts | −105.8 pts | −222.0 pts | −120.4 pts |
| BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF Holds 58 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF Holds 88 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Franklin | Main |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 62.5% | 46.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 86.3% | 91.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 54.0% | 22.9% |
| Holdings | 58 | 88 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 50.0% | 24.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.82% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.58% | 0.90% |
| Total return, 1 year | −22.6% | +3.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −39.1 pts | −13.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −44.3 pts | −18.2 pts |
| Below its high | −44.5% | −9.0% |
| Net assets | $5m | $211m |
BUYZ in plain words
By weight, 62% of BUYZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −22.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 39.1 pts. It sits 44.5% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.
TMAT in plain words
By weight, 46% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 24% of the fund across 88 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.0 pts. It sits 9.0% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BUYZ and TMAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BUYZ or TMAT?
- BUYZ has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 46%, so TMAT differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BUYZ or TMAT?
- BUYZ charges 0.50% a year and TMAT charges 0.82%, so BUYZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BUYZ against TMAT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-tmat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.