IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

BUYZ vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BUYZ returned −10.3% to TMAT's −3.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BUYZ and TMAT

Net assets: $5.3m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF, and $237m on Jul 31, 2026 for Main Thematic Innovation ETF.

BUYZ on its own →TMAT on its own →
At a glance
61.5%
BUYZ in the S&P 500
50.3%
TMAT in the S&P 500
−10.3%
BUYZ total return, 1 year
−3.1%
TMAT total return, 1 year
BUYZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.62%39%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 49% of the fund · 58 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 53% in39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.62%39%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 86% · Nasdaq-100: 53% in

62% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

TMAT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 50% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
50% of its weight is outside the S&P 50050% of TMAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.50%50%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 27% of the fund · 87 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 29% in50% of its weight is outside the S&P 50050% of TMAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.50%50%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 29% in

50% of TMAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

BUYZ costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.2 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BUYZ vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBUYZTMAT
Return
Total return, 1 year−10.3%−3.1%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high40.1%, high on Feb 12, 202115.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBroad innovation and megatrendsBroad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 25.1 ptsbehind by 18.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Net assets, BUYZ as of Nov 3, 2026 and TMAT as of Jul 31, 2026$5.3m$237m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · TMAT scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?
IQ Themes Score54.8BUYZ61.4TMAT

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BUYZ and TMAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BUYZ TMAT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BUYZ
AMAZON.COM INC 10.99%
SHOPIFY INC 8.43%
APPLOVIN CORP 5.31%
ALPHABET INC 4.02%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.88%
CARVANA COMPANY 3.64%
DOORDASH INC 3.29%
EBAY INC 3.26%
Only in TMAT
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 4.46%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.23%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 2.77%
FORTINET INC 2.63%
CLEAR SECURE INC 2.43%
VICOR CORP 2.18%
HINGE HEALTH INC 2.09%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.06%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BUYZ vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowBUYZTMATBUYZTMAT
3 months+1.9%−9.4%+2.2 pts vs IWV−8.1 pts vs ACWI
6 months+5.8%−4.9%+0.9 pts vs IWV−7.5 pts vs ACWI
1 year−10.3%−3.1%−25.1 pts vs IWV−18.1 pts vs ACWI
3 years+47.2%+92.3%−33.8 pts vs IWV+14.7 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: BUYZ Feb 2020 · TMAT Jan 2021+54.0%+7.5%−120.5 pts vs IWV−85.1 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF · Holds 58 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF · Holds 87 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 50% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Franklin Main
Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 61.5% 50.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 86.3% 91.6%
In the Nasdaq-100 53.2% 29.4%
Holdings 58 87
Top ten, share of the fund 49.2% 26.9%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.79%
Fee for the differing part 0.58% 0.86%
Total return, 1 year −10.3% −3.1%
vs its benchmark −25.1 pts vs IWV −18.1 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −40.1% −15.9%
Net assets, BUYZ as of Nov 3, 2026 and TMAT as of Jul 31, 2026 $5.3m $237m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BUYZ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −10.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 25.1 pts.

By weight, 62% of BUYZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 40.1% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.

TMAT

By weight, 50% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 27% of the fund across 87 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −3.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index Net, so a holder was behind by 18.1 pts. It sits 15.9% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BUYZ and TMAT hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BUYZ or TMAT?
BUYZ has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 50%, so TMAT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BUYZ or TMAT?
BUYZ charges 0.50% a year and TMAT charges 0.79%, so BUYZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BUYZ vs GTEKBUYZ vs FRWDBUYZ vs FDTXBUYZ vs ILDRTMAT vs DTECTMAT vs FDCFTMAT vs FITETMAT vs GTEK
Where to next
BUYZ on its own →TMAT on its own →BUYZ dividend history →BUYZ holdings →TMAT dividend history →TMAT holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
BUYZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
BUYZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Franklin website ↗
TMAT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
TMAT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Main website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BUYZ against TMAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-tmat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.