Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BULD vs ILDR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BULD returned +23.8% to ILDR's +6.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BULD and ILDRNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $8.6m for Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF and $334m for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF.
36% of BULD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
66% of ILDR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
BULD costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.2 points; ILDR is far larger, $334m against $8.6m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BULD | ILDR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.8% | +6.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 14.4%, high on Jun 30, 2026 | 12.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 8.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $8.6m | $334m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BULD and ILDR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BULD | ILDR | BULD | ILDR |
| 3 months | −9.7% | −7.4% | not measured | −7.1 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | +0.8% | −1.8% | not measured | −6.7 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | +23.8% | +6.6% | not measured | −8.2 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | +76.7% | +107.0% | not measured | +26.0 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: BULD May 2022 · ILDR May 2021 | +67.9% | +75.9% | not measured | −10.3 pts vs IWV |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BULD
By weight, 36% of BULD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 60 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +23.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.4% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 8.2 pts.
By weight, 66% of ILDR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 81 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 12.5% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BULD and ILDR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BULD against ILDR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buld-vs-ildr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BULD against ILDR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buld-vs-ildr
[BULD against ILDR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buld-vs-ildr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.