Data as of .
BOTZ vs IFRA: which is really different?
IFRA holds 71.4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and BOTZ 21.9%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: IFRA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and IFRA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BOTZ | Only in IFRA |
|---|---|
| FANUC CORP 7.98% | UNION PACIFIC 4.43% |
| ABB LTD-REG 7.80% | NEXTERA ENERGY 4.05% |
| KEYENCE CORP 7.75% | CATERPILLAR INC 3.76% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC 7.65% | QUANTA SERVICES INC 3.52% |
| NVIDIA CORP 7.49% | CSX 3.48% |
| SMC CORP 4.59% | SOUTHERN 2.91% |
| DAIFUKU CO LTD 3.30% | CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP 2.85% |
| AURORA INNOVATION INC 2.71% | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP 2.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | IFRA | BOTZ | IFRA | BOTZ | IFRA | |
| 3 months | −4.9% | −5.6% | −8.2 pts | −8.9 pts | −4.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 6 months | +1.3% | +2.3% | −14.7 pts | −13.7 pts | −19.4 pts | −18.4 pts |
| 1 year | +3.6% | +13.5% | −13.9 pts | −4.0 pts | −19.4 pts | −9.5 pts |
| 3 years | +38.0% | +61.6% | −39.9 pts | −16.3 pts | −57.1 pts | −33.5 pts |
| Since launch | +149.0% | +169.3% | −172.1 pts | −57.4 pts | −416.4 pts | −200.6 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF Holds 85 stocks in robotics and automation, 22% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF Holds 164 stocks in infrastructure, 71% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Infrastructure |
| In the S&P 500 | 21.9% | 71.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.2% | 95.7% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 19.0% | 11.0% |
| Holdings | 85 | 164 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 54.6% | 33.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.30% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | 0.31% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +13.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −13.9 pts | −4.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −19.4 pts | −9.5 pts |
| Below its high | −15.2% | −8.9% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 22% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.9 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 71% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 164 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or IFRA?
- BOTZ has 22% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IFRA has 71%, so IFRA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or IFRA?
- BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and IFRA charges 0.30%, so IFRA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against IFRA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-ifra Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.