ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFOpen liveCompare their flowsAsk about these two funds

BAI vs IGF: which is really different?

BAI and IGF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BAI returned +36.6% over the year. iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF.

IGF costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.3 points; BAI is 1.4 times larger.

BAIIGF
Expense ratio0.55%0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$14.6bn$10.3bn
Total return, 1 year+36.6%+5.3%
What it tracksArtificial intelligenceInfrastructure
Holdings in common0%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearahead by 19.4 ptsbehind by 11.9 pts
Below its all-time high11.1%, high on Jun 22, 20268.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

54.1%
BAI in the S&P 500
31.9%
IGF in the S&P 500
+36.6%
BAI total return, 1 year
+5.3%
IGF total return, 1 year
BAI · 1 year to Oct 9, 202646% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.54%46%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 77% · top ten 42% of the fund · 49 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 49% in46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.54%46%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 77% · Nasdaq-100: 49% in

54% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

IGF · 1 year to Oct 9, 202668% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 38% of the fund · 78 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · IGF scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAI and IGF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BAI IGF
Only in BAI
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 6.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.43%
NVIDIA 5.24%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.64%
BROADCOM INC 4.31%
LAM RESEARCH 4.04%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 3.24%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS 2.98%
Only in IGF
TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS 4.83%
AENA SME SA 4.73%
NEXTERA ENERGY 4.70%
IBERDROLA 4.14%
GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO A 3.63%
ENBRIDGE 3.60%
AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.55%
WILLIAMS 3.08%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowBAIIGFBAIIGFBAIIGF
3 months+1.0%−6.2%−2.4 pts−9.6 pts−2.6 pts−9.9 pts
6 months+26.9%−7.3%+11.7 pts−22.4 pts+3.7 pts−30.5 pts
1 year+36.6%+5.3%+19.4 pts−11.9 pts+13.0 pts−18.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+62.1%not published−23.6 ptsnot published−45.1 pts
Since launch
BAI Oct 2024 · IGF Dec 2007
+95.8%+129.4%+59.3 pts−508.6 pts+42.8 pts−1,460.7 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BAI
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF · Holds 49 stocks in artificial intelligence, 54% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 78 stocks in infrastructure, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer iShares iShares
Theme Artificial intelligence Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 54.1% 31.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 77.2% 98.3%
In the Nasdaq-100 48.8% 7.2%
Holdings 49 78
Top ten, share of the fund 41.8% 38.0%
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.37%
Fee for the differing part 0.71% 0.38%
Total return, 1 year +36.6% +5.3%
vs the S&P 500 +19.4 pts −11.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +13.0 pts −18.2 pts
Below its high −11.1% −8.3%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $14.6bn $10.3bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BAI in plain words

By weight, 54% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 77%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +36.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 19.4 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

IGF in plain words

By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BAI and IGF hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BAI or IGF?
BAI has 54% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGF has 32%, so IGF differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BAI or IGF?
BAI charges 0.55% a year and IGF charges 0.37%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BAI vs IFRABAI vs PAVEBAI vs IBBBAI vs PPAIGF vs AIQIGF vs ARTYIGF vs IGVIGF vs PAVE
BAI on its own →IGF on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BAI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BAI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for BAI ↗IGF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗iShares page for IGF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BAI against IGF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-igf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.