IQ

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

AINT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+12.0 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: AINT ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.25 pts
A year: AINT 1.25%, LUMA 1.00%, per filings dated Feb 2, 2026 and Jul 8, 2026
Overlap
0%
Share of the two books held in common, holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

LUMA costs 0.25 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

AINT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureAINTLUMA
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.5%, high on Oct 1, 202633.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksArtificial intelligenceAI infrastructure and chips
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.25%1.00%
Net assets, AINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and LUMA as of Nov 11, 2026$6.5m$10m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Key numbers
99.7%
AINT in the S&P 500
19.4%
LUMA in the S&P 500
+5.5%
AINT total return, since launch, Feb 6, 2026
−23.5%
LUMA total return, since launch, Jul 15, 2026
AINT · 6 months to Nov 12, 2026 0% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
0% of its weight is outside the S&P 500100% of AINT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 0% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.100%0%of its weight in S&P 500 companies0% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 80% · top ten 84% of the fund · 12 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 76% in0% of its weight is outside the S&P 500100% of AINT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 0% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.100%0%of its weight in S&P 500 companies0% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 80% · Nasdaq-100: 76% in

100% of AINT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 0% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

LUMA · 3 months to Nov 12, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 55% of the fund · 27 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 11, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

19% of LUMA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 11, 2026.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AINT and LUMA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 11, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AINT LUMA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AINT
Palo Alto Networks Inc 9.18%
AppLovin Corp 8.84%
NVIDIA Corp 8.51%
Mastercard Inc 8.42%
Meta Platforms Inc 8.39%
Amazon.com Inc 8.38%
DoorDash Inc 8.24%
Microsoft Corp 8.18%
Only in LUMA
AYAR LABS INC 9.61%
COHERENT CORP 5.72%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H 5.72%
AIXTRON SE 5.65%
LAND MARK OPTOELECTRONICS 5.31%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 4.74%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC L-A 4.71%
TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD 4.61%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: AINT vs LUMA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowAINTLUMAAINTLUMA
3 months−17.0%−29.0%not measured−20.7 pts vs EEM
6 months−10.7%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: AINT Feb 2026 · LUMA Jul 2026+5.5%−23.5%not measured−16.7 pts vs EEM

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

AINT FINQ DOLLAR NEUTRAL U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF · Holds 12 stocks in artificial intelligence, 100% of its weight in S&P 500 companies LUMA KraneShares Photonic and Optical ETF · Holds 27 stocks in aI infrastructure and chips, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer FINQ KraneShares
Theme Artificial intelligence AI infrastructure and chips
In the S&P 500 99.7% 19.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 80.3% 99.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 75.7% 8.6%
Holdings 12 27
Top ten, share of the fund 84.1% 54.7%
Expense ratio 1.25% 1.00%
Fee for the differing part 1.56% 1.01%
Total return, 1 year +5.5% (since launch, Feb 6, 2026) −23.5% (since launch, Jul 15, 2026)
vs its benchmark not measured −16.7 pts vs EEM (since launch, Jul 15, 2026)
Below its high −25.5% −33.8%
Net assets, AINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and LUMA as of Nov 11, 2026 $6.5m $10m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

LUMA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AINT

By weight, 100% of AINT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 84% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Feb 6, 2026 the fund returned +5.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.5% below its all-time high of Oct 1, 2026.

LUMA

By weight, 19% of LUMA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 27 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 11, 2026. Since it first traded on Jul 15, 2026 the fund returned −23.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.8% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do AINT and LUMA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, AINT or LUMA?
AINT has 100% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LUMA has 19%, so LUMA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, AINT or LUMA?
AINT charges 1.25% a year and LUMA charges 1.00%, so LUMA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
AINT vs IVEPAINT vs AIHYAINT vs COOLAINT vs CGPTLUMA vs XALUMA vs EPAILUMA vs AIUPLUMA vs KAIT
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →AINT on its own →LUMA on its own →AINT holdings →LUMA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
AINT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
AINT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
FINQ website ↗
LUMA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
LUMA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
KraneShares page for LUMA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AINT against LUMA, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aint-vs-luma

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

AINT and LUMA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

AINT on its own →LUMA on its own →
Growth of 100

AINT and LUMA

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

AINT −17.0%LUMA −29.0%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

AINT −17.0%, LUMA −29.0%: AINT +12.0 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.