Do ABOT and ILDR hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or ILDR?

ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ILDR has 66%, so ABOT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, ABOT or ILDR?

ABOT charges 0.39% a year and ILDR charges 0.75%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

ABOT vs ILDR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ABOT returned +13.5% to ILDR's +6.6%; 19% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ABOT and ILDR

Net assets: $4.0m on Jul 31, 2026 for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF, and $334m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF.

ABOT on its own →ILDR on its own →

At a glance

64.4%

ABOT in the S&P 500

65.5%

ILDR in the S&P 500

+13.5%

ABOT total return, 1 year

+6.6%

ILDR total return, 1 year

ABOT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 36% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

64% of ABOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

ILDR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 35% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

66% of ILDR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ABOT costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ABOT vs ILDR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
Return
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
Total return, 1 year	+13.5%	+6.6%
Drawdown
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
Below its all-time high		12.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 8.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.75%
Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and ILDR as of Nov 3, 2026	$4.0m	$334m
Holdings
Measure	ABOT	ILDR
Holdings in common	19%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	32%	44%

ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · ABOT scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?

IQ Themes Score46.1ABOT10.1ILDR

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

ABOT 46.1

ILDR 10.1

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

19%

By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and ILDR hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

19% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ABOT ILDR

NVIDIA Corp 4.75% 9.90%

Broadcom Inc 3.90% 3.61%

Neurocrine Biosciences Inc 1.90% 1.48%

Rubrik Inc 1.43% 1.54%

ServiceNow Inc 1.93% 1.09%

Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.54% 1.05%

Toast Inc 2.04% 1.00%

Halozyme Therapeutics Inc 1.20% 0.89%

Spotify Technology SA 2.13% 0.87%

Everpure Inc 1.83% 0.78%

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 2.07% 0.70%

Airbnb Inc 2.73% 0.61%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ABOT

Apple Inc 4.94%

AbbVie Inc 3.25%

Snowflake Inc 2.68%

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.61%

Adobe Inc 2.54%

Fortinet Inc 2.54%

Autodesk Inc 2.54%

VeriSign Inc 2.53%

Only in ILDR

Amazon.com, Inc. 6.23%

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5.45%

Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.20%

Eli Lilly and Company 4.02%

Microsoft Corporation 3.11%

Micron Technology, Inc. 2.56%

Oracle Corporation 2.48%

Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.40%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ABOT vs ILDR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	ABOT	ILDR	ABOT	ILDR
3 months	+7.7%	−7.4%	not measured	−7.1 pts vs IWV
6 months	+24.2%	−1.8%	not measured	−6.7 pts vs IWV
1 year	+13.5%	+6.6%	not measured	−8.2 pts vs IWV
3 years	+86.1%	+107.0%	not measured	+26.0 pts vs IWV
Since launchNot the same days: ABOT Dec 2020 · ILDR May 2021	+94.5%	+75.9%	not measured	−10.3 pts vs IWV

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Holds 50 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 64% of its weight in S&P 500 companies ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF · Holds 81 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 66% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Abacus FCF First Trust

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 64.4% 65.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 83.7% 66.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 42.3% 48.8%

Holdings 50 81

Top ten, share of the fund 32.5% 44.0%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.47% 1.12%

Total return, 1 year +13.5% +6.6%

vs its benchmark not measured −8.2 pts vs IWV

Below its high −3.4% −12.5%

Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and ILDR as of Nov 3, 2026 $4.0m $334m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

19% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

ABOT

By weight, 64% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested.

ILDR

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 8.2 pts.

By weight, 66% of ILDR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 81 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 12.5% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ABOT and ILDR hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or ILDR?: ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ILDR has 66%, so ABOT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ABOT or ILDR?: ABOT charges 0.39% a year and ILDR charges 0.75%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ABOT vs QQQJ ABOT vs HTEC ABOT vs XT ABOT vs ARKK ILDR vs XDAT ILDR vs BUYZ ILDR vs GXDW ILDR vs BULD

Where to next

ABOT on its own →ILDR on its own →ABOT dividend history →ABOT holdings →ILDR holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ABOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ABOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Abacus FCF website ↗

ILDR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ILDR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for ILDR ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ABOT against ILDR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-ildr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.