Which came closer to its stated multiple, TEMC or TEMT?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, TEMC finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and TEMT finished 23.3 points from its own, so TEMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are TEMC and TEMT levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Tempus AI, TEMC at +2 times and TEMT at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, TEMC or TEMT?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TEMC’s moved at 76% annualized and TEMT’s at 91%, so TEMT has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold TEMC or TEMT for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, TEMC or TEMT?

TEMC charges 0.45% a year and TEMT charges 1.31%, so TEMC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

TEMC vs TEMT: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TEMC finished 1.5 points from its stated multiple and TEMT 0.2. Corgi TEM 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF.

+63.1%

TEMC returned, since launch

+42.6%

TEMT returned, 3 months

−18.2 pts

TEMC from its stated multiple

−23.3 pts

TEMT from its stated multiple

TEMC · 1 month to Sep 30, 20261.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple

TEMC returned +61.3% while 2 times TEM's move would have been +59.8%

TEMT · 3 months to Sep 30, 202623.3 pts short of its stated multiple

TEMT returned +42.6% while 2 times TEM's move would have been +65.9%

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	TEMC	TEMT	TEMC	TEMT	TEMC	TEMT
1 month	+61.3%	+60.0%	+59.8%	+59.8%	+1.5 pts	+0.3 pts
3 months	not published	+42.6%	not published	+65.9%	not published	−23.3 pts
6 months	not published	+105.3%	not published	+148.3%	not published	−43.0 pts
1 year	not published	−46.0%	not published	+2.9%	not published	−48.9 pts
Since launch TEMC Jul 2026 · TEMT May 2025	+63.1%	−44.2%	+81.3%	+37.7%	−18.2 pts	−81.9 pts

TEMC and TEMT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TEMC

Corgi TEM 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tempus AI (TEM)

TEMT

Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tempus AI (TEM)

Issuer Corgi Tradr

Sets out to return +2x +2x

Underlying asset TEM TEM

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +61.3% +42.6%

Underlying returned, over that window +29.9% +33.0%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window +59.8% +65.9%

Difference from stated, over that window +1.5 pts −23.3 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +63.1% −46.0%

Difference from stated, over that window −18.2 pts −48.9 pts

Underlying volatility 76% 91%

Difference over the days both have traded +1.5 pts +0.3 pts

Expense ratio 0.45% 1.31%

Launched Jul 10, 2026 May 13, 2025

Net assets $541,370 $48m

TEMC and TEMT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TEMC in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: TEMC returned +61.3% where its own daily promise gave +61.6%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TEM's 29.9% implies +59.8%, which makes TEMC look 1.5 points over. 1.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TEMC aims to return +2 times TEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TEM moved at 76% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TEMT in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TEMT returned +42.6% where its own daily promise gave +47.2%, 4.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TEM's 33.0% implies +65.9%, which makes TEMT look 23.3 points short. 18.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TEMT aims to return +2 times TEM's move each day, then resets. TEM moved at 91% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TEMC or TEMT?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, TEMC finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and TEMT finished 23.3 points from its own, so TEMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TEMC and TEMT levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Tempus AI, TEMC at +2 times and TEMT at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TEMC or TEMT?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TEMC’s moved at 76% annualized and TEMT’s at 91%, so TEMT has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TEMC or TEMT for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TEMC or TEMT?: TEMC charges 0.45% a year and TEMT charges 1.31%, so TEMC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

TEMC on its own →TEMT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

TEMC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TEMC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗TEMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TEMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Tradr website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, TEMC against TEMT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/temc-vs-temt

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.