STSM vs TWSC: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, STSM finished 0.1 points short and TWSC 3.9 points short. Defiance Daily Target 2X Short TSM ETF and Corgi TSM 2x Daily ETF.

−13.9%
STSM returned, 3 months
−0.9%
TWSC returned, 3 months
−8.0 pts
STSM from its stated multiple
−6.8 pts
TWSC from its stated multiple
STSM · 3 months to Sep 30, 20268 pts short of its stated multiple
8 pts short of its stated multipleSTSM returned −13.9% while −2 times TSM's move would have been −5.9%TSM +3.0% ×−2 implies−5.9%STSM returned−13.9%8 pts short of its stated multipleSTSM returned −13.9% while −2 times TSM's move would have been −5.9%TSM +3.0% ×−2 implies−5.9%STSM returned−13.9%

STSM returned −13.9% while −2 times TSM's move would have been −5.9%

TWSC · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.8 pts short of its stated multiple
6.8 pts short of its stated multipleTWSC returned −0.9% while 2 times TSM's move would have been +5.9%TSM +3.0% ×2 implies+5.9%TWSC returned−0.9%6.8 pts short of its stated multipleTWSC returned −0.9% while 2 times TSM's move would have been +5.9%TSM +3.0% ×2 implies+5.9%TWSC returned−0.9%

TWSC returned −0.9% while 2 times TSM's move would have been +5.9%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · TWSC scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

STSM among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

STSM 17.2
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

TWSC among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

TWSC 25.2
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. TWSC is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSTSMTWSCSTSMTWSCSTSMTWSC
1 month−18.9%+19.1%−20.3%+20.3%+1.3 pts−1.2 pts
3 months−13.9%−0.9%−5.9%+5.9%−8.0 pts−6.8 pts
6 months−57.5%not published−68.5%not published+10.9 ptsnot published
Since launch
STSM Nov 2025 · TWSC Jun 2026
−76.1%−14.0%−131.7%−8.4%+55.6 pts−5.5 pts

STSM and TWSC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

STSM
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short TSM ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM)
TWSC
Corgi TSM 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM)
Issuer Defiance Corgi
Sets out to return -2x +2x
Underlying asset TSM TSM
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −13.9% −0.9%
Underlying returned, over that window +3.0% +3.0%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −5.9% +5.9%
Difference from stated, over that window −8.0 pts −6.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −76.1% −14.0%
Difference from stated, over that window +55.6 pts −5.5 pts
Underlying volatility 34% 34%
Difference over the days both have traded no shared window −6.8 pts
Expense ratio 1.30% 0.45%
Launched Nov 18, 2025 Jun 30, 2026
Net assets $1m $515,134

STSM and TWSC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

STSM in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: STSM returned −13.9% where its own daily promise gave −13.8%, 0.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TSM's 3.0% implies −5.9%, which makes STSM look 8.0 points short. 7.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. STSM aims to return -2 times TSM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSM moved at 34% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TWSC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TWSC returned −0.9% where its own daily promise gave +3.0%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSM's 3.0% implies +5.9%, which makes TWSC look 6.8 points short. 2.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TWSC aims to return +2 times TSM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, STSM or TWSC?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, STSM finished 8.0 points from what its multiple implies and TWSC finished 6.8 points from its own, so TWSC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are STSM and TWSC levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, STSM at -2 times and TWSC at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, STSM or TWSC?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window STSM’s moved at 34% annualized and TWSC’s at 34%, so STSM has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold STSM or TWSC for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, STSM or TWSC?
STSM charges 1.30% a year and TWSC charges 0.45%, so TWSC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, STSM against TWSC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/stsm-vs-twsc

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.