SKHU vs SKHZ: Leverage, Returns & Decay
Over three months against its daily multiple, compounded, SKHU finished 4.0 points short and SKHZ 0.2 points over. Net assets: $47m on Oct 21, 2026 for ProShares Ultra SK hynix, and $5m on Oct 20, 2026 for Leverage Shares 1X Short SK Hynix Daily ETF.
SKHZ costs 0.20 points a year less; SKHU is 8.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| SKHU | SKHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 20, 2026 | $45m | $5m |
| What it tracks | SKHY (from its own objective) | SK Hynix (from its own objective) |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| What its daily multiple gave, 3 months | −35.3% | −1.2% |
SKHU returned −39.3% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.
SKHU returned −39.3% while 2 times SKHY's move would have been −26.6%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.
SKHZ returned −1.0% while −1 times SKHY's move would have been +13.3%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.
SKHZ returned −1.0% while −1 times SKHY's move would have been +13.3%. Figures from Jul 22, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026.
SKHU among the 508 leveraged ETFs at 2x, over three months
How closely it delivered its daily multiple over 3 months, ranked against 508 leveraged ETFs at 2x, over three months and 35 inverse ETFs at 1x, over three months. 100 is best. How it is computed
SKHZ among the 35 inverse ETFs at 1x, over three months
A percentile among the 508 leveraged ETFs at 2x, over three months. SKHZ is a percentile among the 35 inverse ETFs at 1x, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. Three months only, against the fund's own daily multiple; a different quarter can rank it very differently. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SKHU | SKHZ | SKHU | SKHZ | SKHU | SKHZ |
| 1 month | −45.3% | +28.1% | −48.4% | +24.2% | +3.1 pts | +3.9 pts |
| 3 months | −39.3% | −1.0% | −26.6% | +13.3% | −12.7 pts | −14.3 pts |
| Since launch SKHU Jul 2026 · SKHZ Jul 2026 | −58.4% | +9.5% | −52.2% | +26.1% | −6.2 pts | −16.6 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About SKHU
Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SKHY's −13.3% implies −26.6%, which makes SKHU look 12.7 points short. That is not the fund's objective, which is daily. Of that 12.7, daily compounding is −8.7 points, which any 2 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is −4.0 points against 2 times each day's move, compounded. SKHU aims to return +2 times SKHY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. SKHY moved at 78% annualized over that window. The more it moves, the further the two figures separate.
Over the three months to Oct 21, 2026, SKHU lost 39.3%, against −35.3% for twice SKHY's daily moves.
About SKHZ
Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times SKHY's −13.3% implies +13.3%, which makes SKHZ look 14.3 points short. Of that 14.3, daily compounding is −14.5 points, which any −1 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is +0.2 points against −1 times each day's move, compounded. SKHZ aims to return -1 times SKHY's move each day, then resets. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run.
Over the three months to Oct 21, 2026, SKHZ lost 1.0%, against −1.2% for the inverse of SKHY's daily moves.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its daily multiple, SKHU or SKHZ?
- Over the window to Oct 21, 2026, SKHU finished 12.7 points from what its multiple implies and SKHZ finished 14.3 points from its own, so SKHU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are SKHU and SKHZ levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on SK hynix, SKHU at +2 times and SKHZ at -1 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, SKHU or SKHZ?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SKHU’s moved at 78% annualized and SKHZ’s at 78%, so SKHU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold SKHU or SKHZ for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day, and daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move; after a fall and recovery it is lower.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SKHU against SKHZ, data as of Oct 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/skhu-vs-skhz
ETFIQ. (Oct 21, 2026). SKHU against SKHZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/skhu-vs-skhz
[SKHU against SKHZ (ETFIQ, Oct 21, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/skhu-vs-skhz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.