SJB vs UJB: Leverage, Returns & Decay

SJB returns -1 times Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield each day and UJB +2 times, and they share no window yet. Net assets on Oct 21, 2026: $54m for ProShares Short High Yield and $6m for ProShares Ultra High Yield.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about SJB and UJB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

Both cost 0.95% a year; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; SJB is 9.1 times larger.

SJB vs UJB: Leverage, Returns & Decay
SJBUJB
Expense ratio0.95%0.95%
Net assets$54m$6m
Total return, 1 year+3.9%−2.4%
What it tracksMarkit iBoxx $ Liquid High YieldMarkit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield
Holdings in commonnot published
Volatility, annualized4%7%

Get SJB and UJB fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Performance, window by window

Performance, window by window: SJB vs UJB: Leverage, Returns & Decay
Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSJBUJBSJBUJBSJBUJB
1 month+2.2%−3.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
3 months+3.0%−4.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
6 months+3.5%−5.2%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
1 year+3.9%−2.4%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
3 years−6.3%+39.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →

On the same fields

SJB
ProShares Short High Yield · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield
UJB
ProShares Ultra High Yield · Aims to return twice the daily move of Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield
Sets out to return −1x +2x
Underlying asset Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield
Segment index index
Fund returned, 3 months +3.0% −4.6%
Underlying returned, over that window not published not published
What the stated multiple implies, over that window not published not published
Difference from stated, over that window not available not available
Fund returned, 1 year +3.9% −2.4%
Difference from stated, over that window not available not available
Underlying volatility not available not available
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
First traded Mar 22, 2011 Apr 14, 2011
Net assets $54m $6m

As of Oct 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About SJB

SJB aims to return -1 times Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. SJB itself moved at 4% annualized over that window. Its prospectus names the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, which no listed fund tracks (HYG tracks the iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, a different index), so ETFIQ has no daily series to measure the fund against. Its own return is shown and no achieved multiple is computed.

Over the three months to Oct 21, 2026, SJB returned 3.0%.

About UJB

UJB aims to return +2 times Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield's move each day, then resets. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. UJB itself moved at 7% annualized over that window.

Over the three months to Oct 21, 2026, UJB lost 4.6%.

Questions people ask

Can I hold SJB or UJB for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day, and daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move; after a fall and recovery it is lower.
Which is cheaper, SJB or UJB?
SJB and UJB both charge 0.95% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SJB against UJB, data as of Oct 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sjb-vs-ujb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.