NVDQ vs NVDX: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NVDQ finished 0.2 points over and NVDX 4.6 points short. T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF and T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF.

−33.0%
NVDQ returned, 3 months
+24.6%
NVDX returned, 3 months
−1.6 pts
NVDQ from its stated multiple
−6.8 pts
NVDX from its stated multiple
NVDQ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.6 pts short of its stated multiple
1.6 pts short of its stated multipleNVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVDQ returned−33.0%1.6 pts short of its stated multipleNVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVDQ returned−33.0%

NVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%

NVDX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.8 pts short of its stated multiple
6.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDX returned +24.6% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVDX returned+24.6%6.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDX returned +24.6% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×2 implies+31.4%NVDX returned+24.6%

NVDX returned +24.6% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +31.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVDQ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDQ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

NVDQ 20.4
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

NVDX among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

NVDX 16.4
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. NVDX is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVDQNVDXNVDQNVDXNVDQNVDX
1 month−8.0%+5.8%−7.1%+7.1%−0.9 pts−1.3 pts
3 months−33.0%+24.6%−31.4%+31.4%−1.6 pts−6.8 pts
6 months−52.7%+46.1%−60.5%+60.5%+7.8 pts−14.4 pts
1 year−55.5%+11.7%−45.4%+45.4%−10.2 pts−33.7 pts
Since launch
NVDQ Oct 2023 · NVDX Oct 2023
−99.5%+877.3%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

NVDQ and NVDX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVDQ
T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDX
T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Issuer T-REX T-REX
Sets out to return -2x +2x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −33.0% +24.6%
Underlying returned, over that window +15.7% +15.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −31.4% +31.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −1.6 pts −6.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −55.5% +11.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −10.2 pts −33.7 pts
Underlying volatility 38% 38%
Difference over the days both have traded −1.6 pts −6.8 pts
Expense ratio 1.05% 1.05%
Launched Oct 19, 2023 Oct 19, 2023
Net assets $17m $479m

NVDQ and NVDX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVDQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVDQ returned −33.0% where its own daily promise gave −33.3%, 0.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies −31.4%, which makes NVDQ look 1.6 points short. 1.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDQ aims to return -2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVDX returned +24.6% where its own daily promise gave +29.2%, 4.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies +31.4%, which makes NVDX look 6.8 points short. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDX aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDQ or NVDX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, NVDQ finished 1.6 points from what its multiple implies and NVDX finished 6.8 points from its own, so NVDQ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDQ and NVDX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDQ at -2 times and NVDX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDQ or NVDX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDQ’s moved at 38% annualized and NVDX’s at 38%, so NVDQ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDQ or NVDX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDQ or NVDX?
NVDQ charges 1.05% a year and NVDX charges 1.05%, so NVDQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVDQ against NVDX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvdq-vs-nvdx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.