NBIG vs NBIZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NBIG finished 3.3 points short and NBIZ 0.0 points over. Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF.

−30.4%
NBIG returned, 3 months
−81.0%
NBIZ returned, 3 months
−36.2 pts
NBIG from its stated multiple
−75.1 pts
NBIZ from its stated multiple
NBIG · 3 months to Sep 30, 202636.2 pts short of its stated multiple
36.2 pts short of its stated multipleNBIG returned −30.4% while 2 times NBIS's move would have been +5.8%NBIS +2.9% ×2 implies+5.8%NBIG returned−30.4%36.2 pts short of its stated multipleNBIG returned −30.4% while 2 times NBIS's move would have been +5.8%NBIS +2.9% ×2 implies+5.8%NBIG returned−30.4%

NBIG returned −30.4% while 2 times NBIS's move would have been +5.8%

NBIZ · 3 months to Sep 30, 202675.1 pts short of its stated multiple
75.1 pts short of its stated multipleNBIZ returned −81.0% while −2 times NBIS's move would have been −5.8%NBIS +2.9% ×−2 implies−5.8%NBIZ returned−81.0%75.1 pts short of its stated multipleNBIZ returned −81.0% while −2 times NBIS's move would have been −5.8%NBIS +2.9% ×−2 implies−5.8%NBIZ returned−81.0%

NBIZ returned −81.0% while −2 times NBIS's move would have been −5.8%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NBIG scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NBIG among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

NBIG 33.8
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

NBIZ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

NBIZ 18
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. NBIZ is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNBIGNBIZNBIGNBIZNBIGNBIZ
1 month+25.0%−31.0%+28.7%−28.7%−3.7 pts−2.4 pts
3 months−30.4%−81.0%+5.8%−5.8%−36.2 pts−75.1 pts
6 months+160.0%−98.4%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Since launch
NBIG Oct 2025 · NBIZ Jan 2026
+6.7%−99.3%+176.1%not meaningful−169.4 ptsnot meaningful

NBIG and NBIZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Nebius (NBIS)
NBIZ
Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Nebius (NBIS)
Issuer Leverage Shares Tradr
Sets out to return +2x -2x
Underlying asset NBIS NBIS
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −30.4% −81.0%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.9% +2.9%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +5.8% −5.8%
Difference from stated, over that window −36.2 pts −75.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +6.7% −99.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −169.4 pts not available
Underlying volatility 131% 131%
Difference over the days both have traded −3.7 pts no shared window
Expense ratio 0.76% 1.49%
Launched Oct 27, 2025 Jan 22, 2026
Net assets $114m $41m

NBIG and NBIZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NBIG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NBIG returned −30.4% where its own daily promise gave −27.1%, 3.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NBIS's 2.9% implies +5.8%, which makes NBIG look 36.2 points short. 32.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NBIG aims to return +2 times NBIS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NBIS moved at 131% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NBIZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NBIZ returned −81.0% where its own daily promise gave −81.0%, 0.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NBIS's 2.9% implies −5.8%, which makes NBIZ look 75.1 points short. 75.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NBIZ aims to return -2 times NBIS's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NBIG or NBIZ?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, NBIG finished 36.2 points from what its multiple implies and NBIZ finished 75.1 points from its own, so NBIG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NBIG and NBIZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Nebius, NBIG at +2 times and NBIZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NBIG or NBIZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NBIG’s moved at 131% annualized and NBIZ’s at 131%, so NBIG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NBIG or NBIZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NBIG or NBIZ?
NBIG charges 0.76% a year and NBIZ charges 1.49%, so NBIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NBIG against NBIZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nbig-vs-nbiz

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.