MSFU vs MSFX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MSFU finished 1.4 points from its stated multiple and MSFX 1.0. Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF and T-REX 2X LONG MICROSOFT DAILY TARGET ETF.

+68.9%
MSFU returned, 3 months
+68.4%
MSFX returned, 3 months
+1.4 pts
MSFU from its stated multiple
+1.0 pts
MSFX from its stated multiple
MSFU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.4 pts ahead of its stated multipleMSFU returned +68.9% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%MSFT +33.7% ×2 implies+67.4%MSFU returned+68.9%1.4 pts ahead of its stated multipleMSFU returned +68.9% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%MSFT +33.7% ×2 implies+67.4%MSFU returned+68.9%

MSFU returned +68.9% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%

MSFX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261 pt ahead of its stated multiple
1 pt ahead of its stated multipleMSFX returned +68.4% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%MSFT +33.7% ×2 implies+67.4%MSFX returned+68.4%1 pt ahead of its stated multipleMSFX returned +68.4% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%MSFT +33.7% ×2 implies+67.4%MSFX returned+68.4%

MSFX returned +68.4% while 2 times MSFT's move would have been +67.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · MSFU scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMSFUMSFXMSFUMSFXMSFUMSFX
1 month+1.0%+1.1%+2.2%+2.2%−1.2 pts−1.1 pts
3 months+68.9%+68.4%+67.4%+67.4%+1.4 pts+1.0 pts
6 months+74.0%+72.9%+78.8%+78.8%−4.9 pts−6.0 pts
1 year−18.2%−21.1%−0.3%−0.3%−17.9 pts−20.8 pts
3 years+48.8%not published+132.5%not published−83.7 ptsnot published
Since launch
MSFU Sep 2022 · MSFX Jan 2024
+84.7%+9.2%not meaningful+72.4%not meaningful−63.2 pts

MSFU and MSFX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
MSFX
T-REX 2X LONG MICROSOFT DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
Issuer Direxion T-REX
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset MSFT MSFT
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +68.9% +68.4%
Underlying returned, over that window +33.7% +33.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +67.4% +67.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.4 pts +1.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −18.2% −21.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −17.9 pts −20.8 pts
Underlying volatility 39% 39%
Difference over the days both have traded +1.4 pts +1.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.98% 1.05%
Launched Sep 7, 2022 Jan 11, 2024
Net assets $530m $19m

MSFU and MSFX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MSFU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSFU returned +68.9% where its own daily promise gave +72.9%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MSFT's 33.7% implies +67.4%, which makes MSFU look 1.4 points over. 5.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSFU aims to return +2 times MSFT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSFT moved at 39% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSFX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MSFX returned +68.4% where its own daily promise gave +72.9%, 4.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MSFT's 33.7% implies +67.4%, which makes MSFX look 1.0 points over. MSFX aims to return +2 times MSFT's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSFU or MSFX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MSFU finished 1.4 points from what its multiple implies and MSFX finished 1.0 points from its own, so MSFX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSFU and MSFX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Microsoft, MSFU at +2 times and MSFX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSFU or MSFX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSFU’s moved at 39% annualized and MSFX’s at 39%, so MSFU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSFU or MSFX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MSFU or MSFX?
MSFU charges 0.98% a year and MSFX charges 1.05%, so MSFU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MSFU against MSFX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/msfu-vs-msfx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.