MRVX vs MVLL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MRVX finished 0.3 points from its stated multiple and MVLL 0.1. Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF.

+18.1%
MRVX returned, since launch
−24.5%
MVLL returned, 3 months
−19.4 pts
MRVX from its stated multiple
−18.8 pts
MVLL from its stated multiple
MRVX · 1 month to Sep 30, 2026On its stated multiple
On its stated multipleMRVX returned +50.0% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been +49.7%MRVL +24.8% ×2 implies+49.7%MRVX returned+50.0%On its stated multipleMRVX returned +50.0% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been +49.7%MRVL +24.8% ×2 implies+49.7%MRVX returned+50.0%

MRVX returned +50.0% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been +49.7%

MVLL · 3 months to Sep 30, 202618.8 pts short of its stated multiple
18.8 pts short of its stated multipleMVLL returned −24.5% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been −5.7%MRVL −2.9% ×2 implies−5.7%MVLL returned−24.5%18.8 pts short of its stated multipleMVLL returned −24.5% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been −5.7%MRVL −2.9% ×2 implies−5.7%MVLL returned−24.5%

MVLL returned −24.5% while 2 times MRVL's move would have been −5.7%

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMRVXMVLLMRVXMVLLMRVXMVLL
1 month+50.0%+49.8%+49.7%+49.7%+0.3 pts+0.1 pts
3 monthsnot published−24.5%not published−5.7%not published−18.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+259.2%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
1 yearnot published+354.4%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch
MRVX Jul 2026 · MVLL Mar 2025
+18.1%+347.9%+37.6%not meaningful−19.4 ptsnot meaningful

MRVX and MVLL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MRVX
Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Marvell Technology (MRVL)
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Marvell Technology (MRVL)
Issuer Corgi GraniteShares
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset MRVL MRVL
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +50.0% −24.5%
Underlying returned, over that window +24.8% −2.9%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +49.7% −5.7%
Difference from stated, over that window +0.3 pts −18.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +18.1% +354.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −19.4 pts not available
Underlying volatility 54% 82%
Difference over the days both have traded +0.3 pts +0.1 pts
Expense ratio 1.29% 1.50%
Launched Jul 14, 2026 Mar 7, 2025
Net assets $2m $419m

MRVX and MVLL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MRVX in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: MRVX returned +50.0% where its own daily promise gave +51.8%, 1.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MRVL's 24.8% implies +49.7%, which makes MRVX look 0.3 points over. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MRVX aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MRVL moved at 54% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MVLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MVLL returned −24.5% where its own daily promise gave −20.4%, 4.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times MRVL's −2.9% implies −5.7%, which makes MVLL look 18.8 points short. 14.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MVLL aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. MRVL moved at 82% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MRVX or MVLL?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MRVX finished 0.3 points from what its multiple implies and MVLL finished 18.8 points from its own, so MRVX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MRVX and MVLL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Marvell Technology, MRVX at +2 times and MVLL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MRVX or MVLL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MRVX’s moved at 54% annualized and MVLL’s at 82%, so MVLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MRVX or MVLL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MRVX or MVLL?
MRVX charges 1.29% a year and MVLL charges 1.50%, so MRVX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MRVX against MVLL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/mrvx-vs-mvll

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.