Data as of Oct 27, 2026.

vs
Share
Open in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Leveraged and inverse ETFs

MQQQ vs QID: Leverage, Returns & Decay

Over the three months to Oct 27, 2026, MQQQ returned 11.9% and QID −12.6%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MQQQ and QID

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $252m for Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF and $282m for ProShares UltraShort QQQ.

At a glance

Pair scorecard

QID costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 43.5 points; QID is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MQQQ vs QID: Leverage, Returns & Decay
MeasureMQQQQID
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.7%−24.8%
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months−14.8%
What the underlying did, 3 monthsQQQ 6.9%QQQ 6.9%
What the underlying did, 3 monthsQQQ 6.9%QQQ 6.9%
The multiple over the whole window−2 times gives −13.8%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq-100Nasdaq-100
Against its daily multiple, 3 months2.2 points over
Against the whole-window multiple1.2 points over
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.03%0.95%
Net assets$252m$282m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Side by side

MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF · Aims to return twice QQQ’s move over each calendar month QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Sets out to return +2x −2x
Underlying asset QQQ QQQ
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months +11.9% −12.6%
Underlying returned, over that window +6.9% +6.9%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window not published −13.8%
Difference from stated, over that window not available +1.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year +18.7% −24.8%
Difference from stated, over that window not available +6.0 pts
Underlying volatility 19% 19%
Expense ratio 1.03% 0.95%
First traded Sep 3, 2024 Jul 13, 2006
Net assets $252m $282m

As of Oct 27, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Window by window

Window by window: MQQQ vs QID: Leverage, Returns & Decay
Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowMQQQQIDMQQQQIDMQQQQID
1 month−6.8%+6.5%not meaningful+6.2%not meaningful+0.3 pts
3 months+11.9%−12.6%not meaningful−13.8%not meaningful+1.2 pts
6 months+13.8%−17.4%not meaningful−19.8%not meaningful+2.4 pts
1 year+18.7%−24.8%not meaningful−30.8%not meaningful+6.0 pts
3 years–−77.9%–not meaningful–not meaningful
Since launchNot the same days: MQQQ Sep 2024 · QID Jul 2006+98.0%−100.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

Source: ETFIQ. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-41C562FE24

MQQQ and QID are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 27, 2026 MQQQ returned +18.7% and QID −24.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 43.5 points.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow Nasdaq-100.
  3. Cost (similar). MQQQ charges 1.03% of assets a year and QID 0.95%, a gap of 0.08 points.

Data as of Oct 27, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QID flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MQQQ

Over the month to Sep 30, 2026, MQQQ returned 6.0%, against 6.6% for twice QQQ's return. Across its 12 completed months (Oct 2025 to Sep 2026), the gap to +2 times QQQ ran from −1.0 pts to −0.3 pts.

MQQQ aims to return +2 times QQQ's move over each full calendar month, from the close of the last business day of one month to the close of the last business day of the next. It does not seek that multiple over any other period. Over the three months to Oct 27, 2026, QQQ returned 6.9%.

QID

Over the three months to Oct 27, 2026, QID lost 12.6%, against −14.8% for twice the inverse of QQQ's daily moves. Of that 1.2, daily compounding is −1.0 points, which any −2 times fund would show over the same path, and the fund itself is +2.2 points against −2 times each day's move, compounded.

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times QQQ's 6.9% implies −13.8%, which makes QID look 1.2 points over. That is not the fund's objective, which is daily. QID aims to return -2 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer periods the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: it is lower after a fall and recovery, and can be higher in a steady run. QQQ moved at 19% annualized over that window. The more it moves, the further the two numbers separate.

Questions people ask

Are MQQQ and QID levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Nasdaq-100, MQQQ at +2 times each calendar month’s move and QID at -2 times each day’s move.
Can I hold MQQQ or QID for a year?
MQQQ resets every calendar month and QID resets every day, so the multiple in each name applies to one period only, and the periods compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move.
Which is cheaper, MQQQ or QID?
MQQQ charges 1.03% a year and QID charges 0.95%, so QID is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MQQQ against QID, data as of Oct 27, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/mqqq-vs-qid

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.