QID vs SQQQ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, QID finished 2.6 points over and SQQQ 3.4 points over. ProShares UltraShort QQQ and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ.

−4.2%
QID returned, 3 months
−7.9%
SQQQ returned, 3 months
0.0 pts
QID from its stated multiple
−1.5 pts
SQQQ from its stated multiple
QID · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026On its stated multiple
On its stated multipleQID returned −4.2% while −2 times QQQ's move would have been −4.2%QQQ +2.1% ×−2 implies−4.2%QID returned−4.2%On its stated multipleQID returned −4.2% while −2 times QQQ's move would have been −4.2%QQQ +2.1% ×−2 implies−4.2%QID returned−4.2%

QID returned −4.2% while −2 times QQQ's move would have been −4.2%

SQQQ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.5 pts short of its stated multiple
1.5 pts short of its stated multipleSQQQ returned −7.9% while −3 times QQQ's move would have been −6.4%QQQ +2.1% ×−3 implies−6.4%SQQQ returned−7.9%1.5 pts short of its stated multipleSQQQ returned −7.9% while −3 times QQQ's move would have been −6.4%QQQ +2.1% ×−3 implies−6.4%SQQQ returned−7.9%

SQQQ returned −7.9% while −3 times QQQ's move would have been −6.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SQQQ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowQIDSQQQQIDSQQQQIDSQQQ
1 month−6.2%−9.4%−6.6%−9.9%+0.5 pts+0.5 pts
3 months−4.2%−7.9%−4.2%−6.4%0.0 pts−1.5 pts
6 months−38.0%−54.3%−53.7%−80.6%+15.8 pts+26.4 pts
1 year−34.7%−52.0%−47.6%−71.4%+12.9 pts+19.4 pts
3 years−77.4%−91.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Since launch
QID Jan 2010 · SQQQ Feb 2010
−99.9%−100.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

QID and SQQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

QID
ProShares UltraShort QQQ · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the Nasdaq-100
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ · Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of the Nasdaq-100
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -2x -3x
Underlying asset QQQ QQQ
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −4.2% −7.9%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.1% +2.1%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −4.2% −6.4%
Difference from stated, over that window 0.0 pts −1.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −34.7% −52.0%
Difference from stated, over that window +12.9 pts +19.4 pts
Underlying volatility 19% 19%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.94%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Feb 11, 2010
Net assets $213m $2.1bn

QID and SQQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

QID in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: QID returned −4.2% where its own daily promise gave −6.8%, 2.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times QQQ's 2.1% implies −4.2%, which makes QID look 0.0 points over. 2.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. QID aims to return -2 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. QQQ moved at 19% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SQQQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SQQQ returned −7.9% where its own daily promise gave −11.3%, 3.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times QQQ's 2.1% implies −6.4%, which makes SQQQ look 1.5 points short. 4.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SQQQ aims to return -3 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, QID or SQQQ?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, QID finished 0.0 points from what its multiple implies and SQQQ finished 1.5 points from its own, so QID came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are QID and SQQQ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Nasdaq-100, QID at -2 times and SQQQ at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, QID or SQQQ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window QID’s moved at 19% annualized and SQQQ’s at 19%, so QID has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold QID or SQQQ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, QID or SQQQ?
QID charges 0.95% a year and SQQQ charges 0.94%, so SQQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, QID against SQQQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/qid-vs-sqqq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.