CRCD vs CRCG: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, CRCD finished 0.3 points short and CRCG 7.5 points short. T-REX 2X INVERSE CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF.
CRCD returned −68.2% while −2 times CRCL's move would have been −65.3%
CRCG returned +40.2% while 2 times CRCL's move would have been +65.3%
CRCD among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
CRCG among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. CRCG is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CRCD | CRCG | CRCD | CRCG | CRCD | CRCG |
| 1 month | +5.1% | −32.3% | +28.0% | −28.0% | −22.9 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 3 months | −68.2% | +40.2% | −65.3% | +65.3% | −2.9 pts | −25.1 pts |
| 6 months | −69.6% | −51.9% | +18.9% | −18.9% | −88.5 pts | −33.0 pts |
| 1 year | −89.7% | −87.2% | +76.0% | −76.0% | −165.7 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Since launch CRCD Sep 2025 · CRCG Aug 2025 | −90.6% | −92.4% | +70.6% | −98.0% | −161.2 pts | +5.7 pts |
CRCD and CRCG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CRCD and CRCG on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CRCD in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: CRCD returned −68.2% where its own daily promise gave −67.8%, 0.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times CRCL's 32.6% implies −65.3%, which makes CRCD look 2.9 points short. 2.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCD aims to return -2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRCL moved at 85% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
CRCG in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: CRCG returned +40.2% where its own daily promise gave +47.6%, 7.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times CRCL's 32.6% implies +65.3%, which makes CRCG look 25.1 points short. 17.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCG aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, CRCD or CRCG?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, CRCD finished 2.9 points from what its multiple implies and CRCG finished 25.1 points from its own, so CRCD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are CRCD and CRCG levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Circle Internet, CRCD at -2 times and CRCG at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, CRCD or CRCG?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CRCD’s moved at 85% annualized and CRCG’s at 85%, so CRCD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold CRCD or CRCG for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CRCD against CRCG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/crcd-vs-crcg
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CRCD against CRCG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/crcd-vs-crcg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CRCD against CRCG, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/crcd-vs-crcg
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CRCD against CRCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/crcd-vs-crcg
- Markdown
- [CRCD against CRCG (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/crcd-vs-crcg)