BMNG vs BNMC: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BMNG finished 9.3 points from its stated multiple and BNMC 7.9. Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF and Corgi BMNR 2x Daily ETF.

+176.3%
BMNG returned, 3 months
+156.0%
BNMC returned, since launch
+2.8 pts
BMNG from its stated multiple
+3.1 pts
BNMC from its stated multiple
BMNG · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.8 pts ahead of its stated multiple
2.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleBMNG returned +176.3% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +173.6%BMNR +86.8% ×2 implies+173.6%BMNG returned+176.3%2.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleBMNG returned +176.3% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +173.6%BMNR +86.8% ×2 implies+173.6%BMNG returned+176.3%

BMNG returned +176.3% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +173.6%

BNMC · 1 month to Sep 30, 20267.9 pts short of its stated multiple
7.9 pts short of its stated multipleBNMC returned +0.9% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +8.8%BMNR +4.4% ×2 implies+8.8%BNMC returned+0.9%7.9 pts short of its stated multipleBNMC returned +0.9% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +8.8%BMNR +4.4% ×2 implies+8.8%BNMC returned+0.9%

BNMC returned +0.9% while 2 times BMNR's move would have been +8.8%

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowBMNGBNMCBMNGBNMCBMNGBNMC
1 month−0.5%+0.9%+8.8%+8.8%−9.3 pts−7.9 pts
3 months+176.3%not published+173.6%not published+2.8 ptsnot published
6 months+16.8%not published+68.5%not published−51.6 ptsnot published
Since launch
BMNG Oct 2025 · BNMC Jul 2026
−91.7%+156.0%−101.6%+152.9%+9.8 pts+3.1 pts

BMNG and BNMC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BMNG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR)
BNMC
Corgi BMNR 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR)
Issuer Leverage Shares Corgi
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset BMNR BMNR
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +176.3% +0.9%
Underlying returned, over that window +86.8% +4.4%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +173.6% +8.8%
Difference from stated, over that window +2.8 pts −7.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −91.7% +156.0%
Difference from stated, over that window +9.8 pts +3.1 pts
Underlying volatility 81% 87%
Difference over the days both have traded −9.3 pts −7.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.78% 0.45%
Launched Oct 27, 2025 Jul 10, 2026
Net assets $55m $1m

BMNG and BNMC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BMNG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BMNG returned +176.3% where its own daily promise gave +198.0%, 21.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BMNR's 86.8% implies +173.6%, which makes BMNG look 2.8 points over. 24.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BMNG aims to return +2 times BMNR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. BMNR moved at 81% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

BNMC in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: BNMC returned +0.9% where its own daily promise gave +2.8%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BMNR's 4.4% implies +8.8%, which makes BNMC look 7.9 points short. 6.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BNMC aims to return +2 times BMNR's move each day, then resets. BMNR moved at 87% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BMNG or BNMC?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BMNG finished 2.8 points from what its multiple implies and BNMC finished 7.9 points from its own, so BMNG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BMNG and BNMC levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on BitMine Immersion Technologies, BMNG at +2 times and BNMC at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BMNG or BNMC?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BMNG’s moved at 81% annualized and BNMC’s at 87%, so BNMC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BMNG or BNMC for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BMNG or BNMC?
BMNG charges 0.78% a year and BNMC charges 0.45%, so BNMC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, BMNG against BNMC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bmng-vs-bnmc

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.