BEC vs BEZ: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, BEC finished 2.7 points short and BEZ 0.2 points over. Corgi BE 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF.
BEC returned −33.9% while 2 times BE's move would have been −8.6%
BEZ returned −59.0% while −2 times BE's move would have been +8.6%
BEC among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
BEZ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. BEZ is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BEC | BEZ | BEC | BEZ | BEC | BEZ |
| 1 month | +65.7% | −55.4% | +68.5% | −68.5% | −2.8 pts | +13.2 pts |
| 3 months | −33.9% | −59.0% | −8.6% | +8.6% | −25.3 pts | −67.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −97.3% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful |
| Since launch BEC Jun 2026 · BEZ Feb 2026 | −40.1% | −97.8% | −17.0% | −156.2% | −23.1 pts | +58.4 pts |
BEC and BEZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
BEC and BEZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BEC in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BEC returned −33.9% where its own daily promise gave −31.3%, 2.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times BE's −4.3% implies −8.6%, which makes BEC look 25.3 points short. 22.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BEC aims to return +2 times BE's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. BE moved at 110% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
BEZ in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BEZ returned −59.0% where its own daily promise gave −59.2%, 0.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times BE's −4.3% implies +8.6%, which makes BEZ look 67.6 points short. 67.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BEZ aims to return -2 times BE's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, BEC or BEZ?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BEC finished 25.3 points from what its multiple implies and BEZ finished 67.6 points from its own, so BEC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are BEC and BEZ levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Bloom Energy, BEC at +2 times and BEZ at -2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, BEC or BEZ?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BEC’s moved at 110% annualized and BEZ’s at 110%, so BEC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold BEC or BEZ for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, BEC against BEZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bec-vs-bez
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BEC against BEZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bec-vs-bez Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, BEC against BEZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bec-vs-bez
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). BEC against BEZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bec-vs-bez
- Markdown
- [BEC against BEZ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/bec-vs-bez)