ASTN vs ASTT: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ASTN finished 9.3 points short and ASTT 1.2 points short. Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF and Corgi ASTS 2x Daily ETF.

+17.0%
ASTN returned, 3 months
−62.4%
ASTT returned, 3 months
−46.3 pts
ASTN from its stated multiple
+0.9 pts
ASTT from its stated multiple
ASTN · 3 months to Sep 30, 202646.3 pts short of its stated multiple
46.3 pts short of its stated multipleASTN returned +17.0% while −2 times ASTS's move would have been +63.3%ASTS −31.6% ×−2 implies+63.3%ASTN returned+17.0%46.3 pts short of its stated multipleASTN returned +17.0% while −2 times ASTS's move would have been +63.3%ASTS −31.6% ×−2 implies+63.3%ASTN returned+17.0%

ASTN returned +17.0% while −2 times ASTS's move would have been +63.3%

ASTT · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts ahead of its stated multiple
0.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleASTT returned −62.4% while 2 times ASTS's move would have been −63.3%ASTS −31.6% ×2 implies−63.3%ASTT returned−62.4%0.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleASTT returned −62.4% while 2 times ASTS's move would have been −63.3%ASTS −31.6% ×2 implies−63.3%ASTT returned−62.4%

ASTT returned −62.4% while 2 times ASTS's move would have been −63.3%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · ASTT scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ASTN among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

ASTN 3.6
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

ASTT among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

ASTT 93.5
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. ASTT is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowASTNASTTASTNASTTASTNASTT
1 month−12.6%−5.9%+0.8%−0.8%−13.4 pts−5.1 pts
3 months+17.0%−62.4%+63.3%−63.3%−46.3 pts+0.9 pts
6 months−68.1%not published+59.8%not published−128.0 ptsnot published
Since launch
ASTN Feb 2026 · ASTT Jun 2026
−71.3%−64.7%+84.4%−67.5%−155.7 pts+2.8 pts

ASTN and ASTT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ASTN
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short ASTS ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of AST SpaceMobile (ASTS)
ASTT
Corgi ASTS 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of AST SpaceMobile (ASTS)
Issuer Defiance Corgi
Sets out to return -2x +2x
Underlying asset ASTS ASTS
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +17.0% −62.4%
Underlying returned, over that window −31.6% −31.6%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +63.3% −63.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −46.3 pts +0.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −71.3% −64.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −155.7 pts +2.8 pts
Underlying volatility 83% 83%
Difference over the days both have traded no shared window +0.9 pts
Expense ratio 1.31% 0.45%
Launched Feb 6, 2026 Jun 30, 2026
Net assets $4m $233,340

ASTN and ASTT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ASTN in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ASTN returned +17.0% where its own daily promise gave +26.4%, 9.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times ASTS's −31.6% implies +63.3%, which makes ASTN look 46.3 points short. 36.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTN aims to return -2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASTS moved at 83% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ASTT in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ASTT returned −62.4% where its own daily promise gave −61.2%, 1.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times ASTS's −31.6% implies −63.3%, which makes ASTT look 0.9 points over. 2.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASTT aims to return +2 times ASTS's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASTN or ASTT?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ASTN finished 46.3 points from what its multiple implies and ASTT finished 0.9 points from its own, so ASTT came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ASTN and ASTT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on AST SpaceMobile, ASTN at -2 times and ASTT at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ASTN or ASTT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASTN’s moved at 83% annualized and ASTT’s at 83%, so ASTN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ASTN or ASTT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ASTN or ASTT?
ASTN charges 1.31% a year and ASTT charges 0.45%, so ASTT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ASTN against ASTT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/astn-vs-astt

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.