Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASMG or ASMZ?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ASMG finished 7.6 points from what its multiple implies and ASMZ finished 6.7 points from its own, so ASMZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are ASMG and ASMZ levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on ASML Holding, ASMG at +2 times and ASMZ at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, ASMG or ASMZ?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASMG’s moved at 42% annualized and ASMZ’s at 42%, so ASMG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold ASMG or ASMZ for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, ASMG or ASMZ?

ASMG charges 0.77% a year and ASMZ charges 0.45%, so ASMZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ASMG vs ASMZ: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, ASMG finished 7.6 points from its stated multiple and ASMZ 6.7. Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF and Corgi ASML 2x Daily ETF.

−10.7%

ASMG returned, 3 months

−9.9%

ASMZ returned, 3 months

−7.6 pts

ASMG from its stated multiple

−6.7 pts

ASMZ from its stated multiple

ASMG · 3 months to Sep 30, 20267.6 pts short of its stated multiple

ASMG returned −10.7% while 2 times ASML's move would have been −3.1%

ASMZ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20266.7 pts short of its stated multiple

ASMZ returned −9.9% while 2 times ASML's move would have been −3.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · ASMZ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ASMG 31.8

ASMZ 51.6

0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	ASMG	ASMZ	ASMG	ASMZ	ASMG	ASMZ
1 month	+11.4%	+11.6%	+13.6%	+13.6%	−2.2 pts	−2.0 pts
3 months	−10.7%	−9.9%	−3.1%	−3.1%	−7.6 pts	−6.7 pts
6 months	+47.8%	not published	+67.4%	not published	−19.6 pts	not published
1 year	+152.8%	not published	+176.8%	not published	−24.0 pts	not published
Since launch ASMG Jan 2025 · ASMZ Jun 2026	+260.3%	−23.8%	not meaningful	−17.6%	not meaningful	−6.2 pts

ASMG and ASMZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ASMG

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of ASML Holding (ASML)

ASMZ

Corgi ASML 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of ASML Holding (ASML)

Issuer Leverage Shares Corgi

Sets out to return +2x +2x

Underlying asset ASML ASML

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −10.7% −9.9%

Underlying returned, over that window −1.6% −1.6%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window −3.1% −3.1%

Difference from stated, over that window −7.6 pts −6.7 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +152.8% −23.8%

Difference from stated, over that window −24.0 pts −6.2 pts

Underlying volatility 42% 42%

Difference over the days both have traded −7.6 pts −6.7 pts

Expense ratio 0.77% 0.45%

Launched Jan 14, 2025 Jun 30, 2026

Net assets $36m $426,208

ASMG and ASMZ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ASMG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ASMG returned −10.7% where its own daily promise gave −7.3%, 3.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times ASML's −1.6% implies −3.1%, which makes ASMG look 7.6 points short. 4.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASMG aims to return +2 times ASML's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASML moved at 42% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ASMZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ASMZ returned −9.9% where its own daily promise gave −7.3%, 2.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times ASML's −1.6% implies −3.1%, which makes ASMZ look 6.7 points short. ASMZ aims to return +2 times ASML's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASMG or ASMZ?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ASMG finished 7.6 points from what its multiple implies and ASMZ finished 6.7 points from its own, so ASMZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ASMG and ASMZ levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on ASML Holding, ASMG at +2 times and ASMZ at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ASMG or ASMZ?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASMG’s moved at 42% annualized and ASMZ’s at 42%, so ASMG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ASMG or ASMZ for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ASMG or ASMZ?: ASMG charges 0.77% a year and ASMZ charges 0.45%, so ASMZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ASMG vs ASMU ASMZ vs ASMU

ASMG on its own →ASMZ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ASMG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ASMG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Leverage Shares website ↗ASMZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ASMZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ASMG against ASMZ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/asmg-vs-asmz

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.