AMZD vs AMZO: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AMZD finished 1.3 points over and AMZO 1.4 points over. Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF and Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF.

−5.6%
AMZD returned, 3 months
−16.4%
AMZO returned, 3 months
−2.5 pts
AMZD from its stated multiple
−10.2 pts
AMZO from its stated multiple
AMZD · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.5 pts short of its stated multiple
2.5 pts short of its stated multipleAMZD returned −5.6% while −1 times AMZN's move would have been −3.1%AMZN +3.1% ×−1 implies−3.1%AMZD returned−5.6%2.5 pts short of its stated multipleAMZD returned −5.6% while −1 times AMZN's move would have been −3.1%AMZN +3.1% ×−1 implies−3.1%AMZD returned−5.6%

AMZD returned −5.6% while −1 times AMZN's move would have been −3.1%

AMZO · 3 months to Sep 30, 202610.2 pts short of its stated multiple
10.2 pts short of its stated multipleAMZO returned −16.4% while −2 times AMZN's move would have been −6.2%AMZN +3.1% ×−2 implies−6.2%AMZO returned−16.4%10.2 pts short of its stated multipleAMZO returned −16.4% while −2 times AMZN's move would have been −6.2%AMZN +3.1% ×−2 implies−6.2%AMZO returned−16.4%

AMZO returned −16.4% while −2 times AMZN's move would have been −6.2%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · AMZO scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowAMZDAMZOAMZDAMZOAMZDAMZO
1 month+4.2%+8.0%+4.1%+8.2%+0.1 pts−0.2 pts
3 months−5.6%−16.4%−3.1%−6.2%−2.5 pts−10.2 pts
6 months−18.6%−40.2%−18.3%−36.6%−0.3 pts−3.6 pts
1 year−16.8%not published−13.5%not published−3.4 ptsnot published
3 years−53.9%not published−96.0%not published+42.1 ptsnot published
Since launch
AMZD Sep 2022 · AMZO Mar 2026
−57.1%−42.8%−92.4%−40.4%+35.3 pts−2.4 pts

AMZD and AMZO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
AMZO
Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
Issuer Direxion Tradr
Sets out to return -1x -2x
Underlying asset AMZN AMZN
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −5.6% −16.4%
Underlying returned, over that window +3.1% +3.1%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −3.1% −6.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.5 pts −10.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −16.8% −42.8%
Difference from stated, over that window −3.4 pts −2.4 pts
Underlying volatility 41% 41%
Expense ratio 1.02% 1.49%
Launched Sep 7, 2022 Mar 24, 2026
Net assets $14m $883,087

AMZD and AMZO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AMZD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AMZD returned −5.6% where its own daily promise gave −7.0%, 1.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AMZN's 3.1% implies −3.1%, which makes AMZD look 2.5 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZD aims to return -1 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 41% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AMZO in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AMZO returned −16.4% where its own daily promise gave −17.8%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times AMZN's 3.1% implies −6.2%, which makes AMZO look 10.2 points short. 11.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZO aims to return -2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMZD or AMZO?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, AMZD finished 2.5 points from what its multiple implies and AMZO finished 10.2 points from its own, so AMZD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AMZD and AMZO levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Amazon.com, AMZD at -1 times and AMZO at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AMZD or AMZO?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMZD’s moved at 41% annualized and AMZO’s at 41%, so AMZD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AMZD or AMZO for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AMZD or AMZO?
AMZD charges 1.02% a year and AMZO charges 1.49%, so AMZD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AMZD against AMZO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/amzd-vs-amzo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.