Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TDVI vs XLCI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLCI paid 10.9% of its price in cash against TDVI’s 8.1%, though TDVI returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

8.1%TDVI cash paid, 1 year
10.9%XLCI cash paid, 1 year
+17.1%TDVI total return, 1 year
+2.2%XLCI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLCI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

TDVI 44.8XLCI 63.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TDVI20.9 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%TDVI+17.1%8.1% as cash20.9 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%TDVI+17.1%20.9 pts behind XLK
XLCI7.9 pts ahead of XLC · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLCTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLC

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TDVI and XLCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in TDVIOnly in XLCI
Texas Instruments Incorporated 8.22%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER 99.79%
Oracle Corporation 7.97%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.38%
International Business Machines Corporation 7.90%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER OCT26 117 CALL -0.17%
Microsoft Corporation 7.83%
Broadcom Inc. 7.77%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR) 4.21%
QUALCOMM Incorporated 4.19%
Analog Devices, Inc. 3.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

TDVI and XLCI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
TDVIXLCITDVIXLCITDVIXLCI
3 months−2.9%+3.2%1.9%2.9%−2.1 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+21.2%+2.8%4.5%5.5%−19.2 pts+3.4 pts
1 year+17.1%+2.2%8.1%10.9%−20.9 pts+7.9 pts
3 years+101.3%not published31.3%not published−26.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+101.0%+7.3%31.3%12.4%−29.0 pts+1.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TDVI and XLCI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on XLK, paying monthly
XLCI
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLC, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustState Street
Strategydividend stocks with call overlaycovered call
BenchmarkTechnology sector (XLK)Communication services (XLC)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.9%8.1%
Expense ratio0.75%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year8.1%10.9%
Price change, 1 year+8.2%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+17.1%+2.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+38.0%−5.7%
Ahead or behind−20.9 pts+7.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1135 days415 days
Net assets$631m$3m

TDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDVI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 20.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.9%, paid monthly.

XLCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLCI paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.2%. Communication services (XLC) returned −5.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, TDVI or XLCI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDVI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and XLCI paid 10.9%, so XLCI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, TDVI or XLCI?
With every distribution reinvested, TDVI returned +17.1% and XLCI returned +2.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, TDVI or XLCI?
TDVI charges 0.75% a year and XLCI charges 0.35%, so XLCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TDVI against XLCI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TDVI against XLCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tdvi-vs-xlci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources