Data as of .
SIOO vs TCAL: which paid, and which earned it?
SIOO and TCAL both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SIOO and TCAL hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SIOO | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.41% | 1.53% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.91% | 1.50% |
| Visa Inc | 1.37% | 1.69% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.00% | 1.04% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.12% | 1.01% |
| Mastercard Inc | 0.97% | 1.50% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.96% | 1.14% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.57% | 0.95% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.45% | 0.86% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 0.81% | 1.20% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.05% | 0.77% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 0.76% | 0.90% |
| Only in SIOO | Only in TCAL |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 9.83% | WATERS CORP 1.97% |
| Apple Inc 9.24% | VERALTO CORP 1.87% |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 7.85% | WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.62% | YUM BRANDS INC 1.72% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.37% | NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 1.56% |
| Tesla Inc 2.23% | TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.56% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.03% | STRYKER CORP 1.50% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 1.85% | AMETEK INC 1.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIOO | TCAL | SIOO | TCAL | SIOO | TCAL | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +4.2% | 3.7% | 3.5% | +0.7 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +14.3% | +5.3% | 7.9% | 6.3% | −5.8 pts | −12.7 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +3.0% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −13.5 pts |
| Since launch | +10.8% | +3.9% | 11.1% | 15.2% | −0.2 pts | −32.7 pts |
| SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF Covered call on OEF, paying monthly | TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | T. Rowe Price |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 100 (OEF) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 9.4% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.1% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025) | 11.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −1.1% | −8.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025) | +3.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.0% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.2 pts | −13.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 281 days | 540 days |
| Net assets | $21m | $276m |
SIOO in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 11, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SIOO paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. S&P 100 (OEF) returned +11.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
TCAL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIOO against TCAL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sioo-vs-tcal Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.