Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FGSI vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its price in cash against FGSI’s 8.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FGSI and TCAL

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $2.0m for FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and $324m for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF.

At a glance
8.3%
FGSI cash paid, 1 year
11.4%
TCAL cash paid, 1 year
+9.0%
FGSI total return, 1 year
+11.2%
TCAL total return, 1 year
FGSI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with FTGS
FGSI
+9.0%
FTGS
+8.8%

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% of it arrived as cash

about even with FTGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% cash

about even with FTGS

8.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TCAL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.4 pts behind its own stocks
TCAL
+11.2%
Own
+14.6%

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own stocks

+14.6%

TCAL

+11.2%

11.4% of it arrived as cash

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own stocks

+14.6%

TCAL

+11.2%

11.4% as cash

11.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

TCAL costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; TCAL is far larger, $324m against $2.0m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FGSI vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFGSITCAL
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+9.0%+11.2%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.2%fell 1.2%
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkFirst Trust Growth Strength ETF, measured through FTGSits own stocks
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.34%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.0m$324m
Holdings
Holdings in common11%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · FGSI scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score63.2FGSI54.8TCAL

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and TCAL hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FGSI TCAL
Mastercard Incorporated 2.10% 1.51%
Stryker Corporation 2.10% 1.51%
S&P Global Inc. 2.16% 1.22%
Arista Networks, Inc. 1.91% 1.13%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 1.73% 1.02%
General Dynamics Corporation 2.16% 0.97%
Broadcom Inc. 2.02% 0.96%
Netflix, Inc. 1.79% 0.96%
DexCom, Inc. 1.92% 0.74%
Workday, Inc. (Class A) 2.07% 0.62%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FGSI
Vertiv Holdings Co (Class A) 2.28%
Eli Lilly and Company 2.25%
United Therapeutics Corporation 2.25%
Blackstone Inc. 2.21%
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2.20%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 2.18%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 2.15%
Arch Capital Group Ltd. 2.12%
Only in TCAL
DANAHER CORP 2.02%
WATERS CORP 1.99%
VERALTO CORP 1.89%
WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.82%
YUM BRANDS INC 1.73%
MCDONALD S CORP 1.71%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.71%
LINDE PLC 1.65%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF · Writes calls on the S&P 500, measured against The Growth Strength Index, paying monthly TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF · Covered call on its own stocks, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) TCAL's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.3% 13.0%
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.34%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.3% 11.4%
Price change, 1 year +0.2% −1.2%
Total return, 1 year +9.0% +11.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +8.8% +14.6%
Ahead or behind +0.2 pts −3.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 53% not published
Age 1.4 years 1.6 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.0m $324m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FGSI vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFGSITCALFGSITCALFGSITCAL
3 months−2.2%+5.3%2.0%2.6%+0.6 pts−1.8 pts
6 months+6.3%+12.3%4.3%6.3%+0.2 pts−0.9 pts
1 year+9.0%+11.2%8.3%11.4%+0.2 pts−3.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FGSI Jun 2025 · TCAL Mar 2025+13.6%+12.0%11.3%16.9%−0.7 ptsnot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

FGSI and TCAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FGSI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.0%. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) returned +8.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 53% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

TCAL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. TCAL's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026) returned +14.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or TCAL?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting price in cash and TCAL paid 11.4%, so TCAL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or TCAL?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +9.0% and TCAL +11.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or TCAL?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and TCAL charges 0.34%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FGSI against TCAL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-tcal

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.