Data as of .
SDVD vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year SDVD paid 9.2% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.6% and the two finished level on total return.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YLDE scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SDVD and YLDE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SDVD | Only in YLDE |
|---|---|
| National HealthCare Corporation 1.12% | WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.63% |
| First BanCorp. 1.04% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 4.05% |
| OFG Bancorp 1.03% | ALPHABET INC 3.60% |
| The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01% | NVIDIA CORP 3.03% |
| Interparfums, Inc. 1.00% | NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94% |
| Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00% | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83% |
| VeriSign, Inc. 1.00% | APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78% |
| Assurant, Inc. 0.99% | MICROSOFT CORP 2.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDVD | YLDE | SDVD | YLDE | SDVD | YLDE | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +2.5% | 2.1% | 2.3% | −6.7 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.3% | +8.4% | 4.4% | 4.1% | −4.3 pts | −9.6 pts |
| 1 year | +10.8% | +10.5% | 9.2% | 7.6% | −16.4 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | +53.0% | +51.1% | 30.7% | 16.8% | −0.7 pts | −27.3 pts |
| Since launch | +47.6% | +181.4% | 29.7% | 42.1% | −4.1 pts | −86.6 pts |
| SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | YLDE Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Franklin |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.48% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.2% | 7.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | +1.2% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% | +10.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −16.4 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1135 days | 3405 days |
| Net assets | $888m | $170m |
SDVD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
YLDE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SDVD or YLDE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.6%, so SDVD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SDVD or YLDE?
- With every distribution reinvested, SDVD returned +10.8% and YLDE returned +10.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SDVD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SDVD or YLDE?
- SDVD charges 0.85% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDVD against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sdvd-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.