Data as of .
SDVD vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?
SDVD and XSHP both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDVD | XSHP | SDVD | XSHP | SDVD | XSHP | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | −11.0% | 2.1% | 7.4% | −6.7 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.3% | not published | 4.4% | not published | −4.3 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +10.8% | not published | 9.2% | not published | −16.4 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +53.0% | not published | 30.7% | not published | −0.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +47.6% | −13.1% | 29.7% | 7.3% | −4.1 pts | −16.4 pts |
| SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | XSHP Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Kurv |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.8% | 33.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.2% | 7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +1.2% | −21.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% | −13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +3.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −16.4 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 94% |
| Age | 1135 days | 93 days |
| Net assets | $888m | $7m |
SDVD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
XSHP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, SDVD or XSHP?
- SDVD charges 0.85% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so SDVD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDVD against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sdvd-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.