Data as of .
ROCQ vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
ROCQ and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ROCQ and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ROCQ | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.37% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| Apple, Inc. 7.12% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 6.70% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 6.30% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Microsoft Corp. 5.03% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.74% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.52% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Lam Research Corp. 4.21% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCQ | YMAG | ROCQ | YMAG | ROCQ | YMAG | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +6.1% | 3.0% | 9.4% | +2.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +20.0% | +15.4% | 5.9% | 21.1% | −4.2 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +18.0% | +70.7% | 5.8% | 89.1% | −4.0 pts | −34.1 pts |
| ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.6% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.0% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.9% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 183 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $629m | $297m |
ROCQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ROCQ against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rocq-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.