Data as of .
ROCQ vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?
ROCQ and SCLZ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ROCQ and SCLZ hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ROCQ | SCLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 6.70% | 7.89% |
| Apple, Inc. | 7.12% | 6.15% |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.37% | 5.99% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 6.30% | 5.18% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.74% | 5.14% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 4.52% | 3.75% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 5.03% | 3.71% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 2.94% | 3.34% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.93% | 4.71% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 2.94% | 1.80% |
| Walmart, Inc. | 3.50% | 1.48% |
| Netflix, Inc. | 1.52% | 0.99% |
| Only in ROCQ | Only in SCLZ |
|---|---|
| Lam Research Corp. 4.21% | ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% |
| Intel Corp. 3.58% | JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.50% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc 2.77% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. 2.19% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.01% |
| ASML Holding NV 1.60% | GE AEROSPACE 2.74% |
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.52% | VISA INC 2.27% |
| Sandisk Corp. 1.08% | CATERPILLAR INC 1.84% |
| NXP Semiconductors NV 0.98% | HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCQ | SCLZ | ROCQ | SCLZ | ROCQ | SCLZ | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +2.9% | 3.0% | 2.1% | +2.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +20.0% | +14.2% | 5.9% | 3.8% | −4.2 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +13.2% | not published | 8.4% | not published | −14.0 pts |
| Since launch | +18.0% | +36.5% | 5.8% | 19.6% | −4.0 pts | −6.3 pts |
| ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | Swan |
| Strategy | covered call | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.6% | 8.5% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.0% | +4.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | +13.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.9% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.0 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 183 days | 934 days |
| Net assets | $629m | $20m |
ROCQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ROCQ against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rocq-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.