Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLG vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against TDAQ’s 17.4%, though TDAQ returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF.

17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
17.4%TDAQ cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
+22.8%TDAQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TDAQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLG 71.1TDAQ 74.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ
TDAQ1 pt ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% of it arrived as cash1 pt ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% as cash1 pt ahead of QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QYLGOnly in TDAQ
NVIDIA CORP 8.44%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00%
APPLE INC 7.73%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.77%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLG and TDAQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLGTDAQQYLGTDAQQYLGTDAQ
3 months−0.1%−1.0%2.1%4.1%+2.4 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+19.6%+22.7%4.6%9.7%−4.7 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+22.2%+22.8%17.4%17.4%+0.5 pts+1.0 pts
3 years+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+122.0%+27.2%75.3%18.0%−52.0 pts+1.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLG and TDAQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XTappAlpha
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.8%17.1%
Expense ratio0.35%0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year17.4%17.4%
Price change, 1 year+2.4%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+22.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind+0.5 pts+1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate96%not published
Age2187 days379 days
Net assets$175m$248m

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TDAQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLG or TDAQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and TDAQ paid 17.4%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or TDAQ?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and TDAQ returned +22.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDAQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLG or TDAQ?
QYLG charges 0.35% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLG against TDAQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources