Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QUSA vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

QUSA and XQQI both write options for income.

VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
13.7%XQQI cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year
+14.3%XQQI total return, 1 year
QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL
XQQI2.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% of it arrived as cash2.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% as cash2.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and XQQI hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUSA and XQQI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUSAXQQI
Apple Inc5.99%7.91%
Microsoft Corp6.08%5.94%
NVIDIA Corp5.78%8.70%
Meta Platforms Inc4.28%3.27%
Broadcom Inc4.70%2.75%
Walmart Inc4.17%2.38%
Alphabet Inc2.22%3.28%
Costco Wholesale Corp4.40%1.84%
Alphabet Inc1.84%3.02%
Lam Research Corp3.47%1.67%
Applied Materials Inc2.61%1.60%
Netflix Inc3.79%1.41%
Only in each
Only in QUSAOnly in XQQI
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%Micron Technology Inc 5.12%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%Amazon.com Inc 4.39%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08%
Eli Lilly & Co 4.24%Tesla Inc 3.01%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.85%Intel Corp 2.44%
Visa Inc 3.37%Cisco Systems Inc 1.91%
Blackrock Inc 2.99%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.86%
Johnson & Johnson 2.93%Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QUSA and XQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QUSAXQQIQUSAXQQIQUSAXQQI
3 months−1.9%−2.7%3.6%4.8%−3.6 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+10.4%+21.8%7.8%11.4%−4.3 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+3.5%not published13.8%not published−11.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+4.9%+14.3%15.1%13.7%−25.8 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QUSA and XQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.3%20.5%
Expense ratio0.97%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year13.8%13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−11.0%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.2%+17.3%
Ahead or behind−11.7 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age500 days227 days
Net assets$22m$351m

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

XQQI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, QUSA or XQQI?
QUSA charges 0.97% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUSA against XQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources