Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QUSA vs XIMR: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against XIMR’s 6.7%, though XIMR returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March.

13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
6.7%XIMR cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year
+7.5%XIMR total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIMR scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QUSA 21.4XIMR 48.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL
XIMR9.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XIMR+7.5%6.7% of it arrived as cash9.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XIMR+7.5%9.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and XIMR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QUSAOnly in XIMR
Microsoft Corp 6.08%2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 114.57%
Apple Inc 5.99%2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 1.15%
NVIDIA Corp 5.78%US Dollar 0.78%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.60%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.60%
Broadcom Inc 4.70%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.59%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.59%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QUSA and XIMR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QUSAXIMRQUSAXIMRQUSAXIMR
3 months−1.9%+1.5%3.6%1.8%−3.6 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+10.4%+5.0%7.8%3.1%−4.3 pts−13.1 pts
1 year+3.5%+7.5%13.8%6.7%−11.7 pts−9.1 pts
Since launch+4.9%+19.2%15.1%16.2%−25.8 pts−32.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QUSA and XIMR on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
XIMR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesFirst Trust
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.3%7.3%
Expense ratio0.97%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year13.8%6.7%
Price change, 1 year−11.0%+0.5%
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+7.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.7 pts−9.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age500 days913 days
Net assets$22m$27m

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

XIMR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIMR paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QUSA or XIMR?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting price in cash and XIMR paid 6.7%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QUSA or XIMR?
With every distribution reinvested, QUSA returned +3.5% and XIMR returned +7.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XIMR returned more.
Which is cheaper, QUSA or XIMR?
QUSA charges 0.97% a year and XIMR charges 0.85%, so XIMR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUSA against XIMR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against XIMR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-ximr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources