Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QRMI vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ULTY paid 44.9% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.8%, though QRMI returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF.

11.8%QRMI cash paid, 1 year
44.9%ULTY cash paid, 1 year
+8.5%QRMI total return, 1 year
−7.8%ULTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QRMI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QRMI 28.4ULTY 3.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QRMI13.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%11.8% as cash13.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%13.3 pts behind QQQ
ULTY24.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QRMI and ULTY hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QRMI and ULTY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQRMIULTY
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES4.00%5.23%
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.25%4.39%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A2.86%4.11%
NVIDIA CORP8.49%2.36%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A1.78%4.27%
LAM RESEARCH CORP1.57%4.34%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.79%4.11%
SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A0.68%3.55%
MERCADOLIBRE INC0.40%4.99%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC0.36%4.75%
STRATEGY INC- CL A0.24%4.66%
ASTERA LABS INC0.23%3.35%
Only in each
Only in QRMIOnly in ULTY
APPLE INC 7.78%Comfort Systems USA Inc 4.61%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.81%Coherent Corp 4.30%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.02%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 4.07%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.33%Robinhood Markets Inc 4.07%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.13%VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 4.07%
TESLA INC 3.03%Figure Technology Solutions Inc 4.02%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.01%TransMedics Group Inc 3.48%
BROADCOM INC 2.69%Caterpillar Inc 3.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QRMI and ULTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QRMIULTYQRMIULTYQRMIULTY
3 months+0.6%−1.1%3.0%13.7%+3.1 pts−3.3 pts
6 months+7.3%+14.0%6.1%30.1%−17.0 pts−4.0 pts
1 year+8.5%−7.8%11.8%44.9%−13.3 pts−24.3 pts
3 years+26.7%not published33.5%not published−71.5 ptsnot published
Since launch+10.4%+10.7%40.8%86.9%−89.1 pts−44.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QRMI and ULTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XYieldMax
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized12.0%59.8%
Expense ratio0.60%1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year11.8%44.9%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%−54.1%
Total return, 1 year+8.5%−7.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−13.3 pts−24.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%100%
Age1849 days932 days
Net assets$15m$721m

QRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ULTY paid 44.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 24.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QRMI or ULTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 44.9%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QRMI or ULTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QRMI returned +8.5% and ULTY returned −7.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QRMI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QRMI or ULTY?
QRMI charges 0.60% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QRMI against ULTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QRMI against ULTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qrmi-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources