Data as of .
QQQI vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?
QQQI and XSHP both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | XSHP | QQQI | XSHP | QQQI | XSHP | |
| 3 months | −0.7% | −11.0% | 3.4% | 7.4% | +1.8 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +16.7% | not published | 7.7% | not published | −7.5 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +16.4% | not published | 15.2% | not published | −5.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +59.6% | −13.1% | 39.9% | 7.3% | −12.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | XSHP Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Kurv |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 14.0% | 33.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 15.2% | 7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −21.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.4% | −13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +3.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 98% | 94% |
| Age | 962 days | 93 days |
| Net assets | $14.8bn | $7m |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XSHP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or XSHP?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.