Data as of .
OVLH vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against OVLH’s 0.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVLH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OVLH and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OVLH | Only in QDTY |
|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% | NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19% |
| XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21% | |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVLH | QDTY | OVLH | QDTY | OVLH | QDTY | |
| 3 months | +0.5% | −0.9% | 0.0% | 7.9% | −1.7 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +11.0% | +20.7% | 0.0% | 17.3% | −7.0 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 1 year | +9.1% | +20.2% | 0.3% | 30.9% | −7.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 3 years | +54.7% | not published | 1.7% | not published | −23.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +73.7% | +27.1% | 3.1% | 42.0% | −45.2 pts | −8.5 pts |
| OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay, hedged on SPY, paying annual | QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Overlay Shares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | put-selling overlay, hedged | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | annual | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 0.3% | 25.9% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.17% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.3% | 30.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.8% | −14.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.1% | +20.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 94% |
| Age | 2072 days | 582 days |
| Net assets | $116m | $27m |
OVLH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.3%, paid annual.
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OVLH or QDTY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.9%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVLH or QDTY?
- With every distribution reinvested, OVLH returned +9.1% and QDTY returned +20.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OVLH against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovlh-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.