Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OCTH vs OEI: which paid, and which earned it?

OCTH and OEI both write options for income.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October and Optimized Equity Income ETF.

6.3%OCTH cash paid, 1 year
8.6%OEI cash paid, 1 year
+6.7%OCTH total return, 1 year
+14.4%OEI total return, 1 year
OCTH9.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%6.3% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%9.9 pts behind SPY
OEI0.9 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+15.3%OEI+14.4%8.6% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+15.3%OEI+14.4%8.6% cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OCTH and OEI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in OCTHOnly in OEI
TREASURY BILL 98.41%NVIDIA Corp 8.32%
TREASURY BILL 1.59%Microsoft Corp 5.99%
Amazon.com Inc 4.56%
Apple Inc 4.28%
Alphabet Inc 3.48%
Broadcom Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OCTH and OEI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OCTHOEIOCTHOEIOCTHOEI
3 months+1.3%+4.8%1.6%2.3%−1.0 pts+2.5 pts
6 months+5.5%+12.5%3.3%4.9%−12.5 pts−5.6 pts
1 year+6.7%not published6.3%not published−9.9 ptsnot published
Since launch+22.9%+14.4%19.1%8.6%−61.9 pts−0.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OCTH and OEI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
OEI
Optimized Equity Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorCore Alternative
Strategydefined incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.4%9.2%
Expense ratio0.79%1.02%
Cash paid, 1 year6.3%8.6% (since launch on Oct 22, 2025)
Price change, 1 year0.0%+5.2%
Total return, 1 year+6.7%+14.4% (since launch on Oct 22, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+15.3%
Ahead or behind−9.9 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1082 days331 days
Net assets$16m$46m

OCTH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly.

OEI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 22, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, OEI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, OCTH or OEI?
OCTH charges 0.79% a year and OEI charges 1.02%, so OCTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OCTH against OEI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OCTH against OEI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/octh-vs-oei Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources