Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NDIV vs XLII: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLII paid 12.8% of its price in cash against NDIV’s 9.8%, though NDIV returned more with it reinvested.

Amplify Energy & Natural Resources Covered Call ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

9.8%NDIV cash paid, 1 year
12.8%XLII cash paid, 1 year
+31.4%NDIV total return, 1 year
+11.9%XLII total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLII scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

NDIV 52.9XLII 58.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NDIV16.4 pts behind XLE · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLE+47.8%NDIV+31.4%9.8% as cash16.4 pts behind XLETotal return, distributions reinvestedXLE+47.8%NDIV+31.4%16.4 pts behind XLE
XLII0.6 pts behind XLI · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLI+12.6%XLII+11.9%12.8% as cash0.6 pts behind XLITotal return, distributions reinvestedXLI+12.6%XLII+11.9%0.6 pts behind XLI

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NDIV and XLII hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in NDIVOnly in XLII
Crescent Energy Co 6.55%STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT 100.52%
Northern Oil & Gas Inc 6.04%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.43%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.59%STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT OCT26 174 -0.94%
Petroleo Brasileiro SA - Petrobras 5.38%
Sunococorp LLC 5.23%
TotalEnergies SE 5.15%
CVR Partners LP 5.13%
BP PLC 5.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

NDIV and XLII over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
NDIVXLIINDIVXLIINDIVXLII
3 months+10.3%−3.8%3.0%2.8%−10.2 pts+2.1 pts
6 months+5.6%+8.1%5.5%6.9%−4.3 pts+2.6 pts
1 year+31.4%+11.9%9.8%12.8%−16.4 pts−0.6 pts
3 years+57.5%not published22.6%not published+3.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+78.3%+13.7%30.8%14.4%+1.2 pts+0.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NDIV and XLII on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NDIV
Amplify Energy & Natural Resources Covered Call ETF
Covered call on XLE, paying monthly
XLII
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLI, paying monthly
IssuerAmplifyState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkEnergy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxyIndustrials (XLI)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.1%5.3%
Expense ratio0.59%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year9.8%12.8%
Price change, 1 year+20.4%−1.2%
Total return, 1 year+31.4%+11.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+47.8%+12.6%
Ahead or behind−16.4 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1486 days415 days
Net assets$32m$15m

NDIV in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NDIV paid 9.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +31.4%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly.

XLII in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLII paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Industrials (XLI) returned +12.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, NDIV or XLII?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NDIV paid 9.8% of its starting price in cash and XLII paid 12.8%, so XLII paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, NDIV or XLII?
With every distribution reinvested, NDIV returned +31.4% and XLII returned +11.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so NDIV returned more.
Which is cheaper, NDIV or XLII?
NDIV charges 0.59% a year and XLII charges 0.35%, so XLII is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NDIV against XLII, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NDIV against XLII, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ndiv-vs-xlii Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources