Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XLII vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLII paid 12.8% of its price in cash against XLSI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

12.8%XLII cash paid, 1 year
11.8%XLSI cash paid, 1 year
+11.9%XLII total return, 1 year
+5.5%XLSI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

XLII 58.3XLSI 67.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

XLII0.6 pts behind XLI · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLI+12.6%XLII+11.9%12.8% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind XLITotal return, distributions reinvestedXLI+12.6%XLII+11.9%12.8% cash0.6 pts behind XLI
XLSI12.5 pts ahead of XLY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%11.8% as cash12.5 pts ahead of XLYTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLII and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLII and XLSI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLIIXLSI
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.43%0.83%
Only in each
Only in XLIIOnly in XLSI
STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT 100.47%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.58%
STATE STREET INDUSTRIAL SELECT OCT26 174 CALL -0.90%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 CALL -0.10%
STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 CALL -0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

XLII and XLSI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XLIIXLSIXLIIXLSIXLIIXLSI
3 months−3.8%+1.2%2.8%3.1%+2.1 pts+6.3 pts
6 months+8.1%+4.9%6.9%6.2%+2.6 pts+1.4 pts
1 year+11.9%+5.5%12.8%11.8%−0.6 pts+12.5 pts
Since launch+13.7%+4.8%14.4%12.7%+0.5 pts+4.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XLII and XLSI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLII
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLI, paying monthly
XLSI
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLY, paying monthly
IssuerState StreetState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkIndustrials (XLI)Consumer discretionary (XLY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.3%9.3%
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year12.8%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−1.2%−6.5%
Total return, 1 year+11.9%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.6%−6.9%
Ahead or behind−0.6 pts+12.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age415 days415 days
Net assets$15m$20m

XLII in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLII paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Industrials (XLI) returned +12.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly.

XLSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, XLII or XLSI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLII paid 12.8% of its starting price in cash and XLSI paid 11.8%, so XLII paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLII or XLSI?
With every distribution reinvested, XLII returned +11.9% and XLSI returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLII returned more.
Which is cheaper, XLII or XLSI?
XLII charges 0.35% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLII is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLII against XLSI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLII against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlii-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources