Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSTY vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.8% of its price in cash against MSTY’s 35.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

35.1%MSTY cash paid, 1 year
36.8%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
−54.4%MSTY total return, 1 year
+22.3%QDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: MSTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MSTY 49.1QDTE 44.79.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSTY5.5 pts ahead of MSTR · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
MSTR−59.8%MSTY−54.4%5.5 pts ahead of MSTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedMSTR−59.8%MSTY−54.4%5.5 pts ahead of MSTR
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%0.7 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MSTY and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MSTYOnly in QDTE
TREASURY BILL 21.68%NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01%
TREASURY BILL 21.18%4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19%
TREASURY BILL 20.64%NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18%
TREASURY BILL 17.38%4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27%
TREASURY BILL 15.04%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05%
TREASURY BILL 4.07%First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30%
Strategy Inc 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jan 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MSTY and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MSTYQDTEMSTYQDTEMSTYQDTE
3 months+3.8%+1.0%16.1%7.8%−1.8 pts+1.8 pts
6 months−7.2%+16.9%32.0%15.9%−1.0 pts−3.8 pts
1 year−54.4%+22.3%35.1%36.8%+5.5 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch+56.5%+58.3%223.1%73.8%−27.1 pts−4.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSTY and QDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSTY
YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on MSTR, paying weekly
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxRoundhill
Strategysynthetic covered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkMicroStrategy (MSTR)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized110.5%24.3%
Expense ratio0.99%0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year35.1%36.8%
Price change, 1 year−80.9%−18.5%
Total return, 1 year−54.4%+22.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year−59.8%+23.0%
Ahead or behind+5.5 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate99%not published
Age932 days918 days

MSTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSTY paid 35.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 80.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −54.4%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −59.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.5 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 110.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSTY or QDTE?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSTY paid 35.1% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.8%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSTY or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, MSTY returned −54.4% and QDTE returned +22.3% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, MSTY or QDTE?
MSTY charges 0.99% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSTY against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSTY against QDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msty-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources