Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QDTE vs RDVI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its price in cash against RDVI’s 9.1%, though RDVI returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QDTE and RDVI

Net assets: $881m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $3.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

At a glance
34.7%
QDTE cash paid, 1 year
9.1%
RDVI cash paid, 1 year
+13.7%
QDTE total return, 1 year
+22.0%
RDVI total return, 1 year
QDTE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE
+13.7%
QQQ
+12.3%

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% of it arrived as cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

34.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RDVI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with RDVY
RDVI
+22.0%
RDVY
+22.2%

About even with RDVY

RDVI over 1 year: paid 9.1%, price +12.2%, total +22.0%, RDVY +22.2%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

RDVY

+22.2%

RDVI

+22.0%

9.1% of it arrived as cash

about even with RDVY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with RDVY

RDVI over 1 year: paid 9.1%, price +12.2%, total +22.0%, RDVY +22.2%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

RDVY

+22.2%

RDVI

+22.0%

about even with RDVY

9.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RDVI over 1 year: paid 9.1%, price +12.2%, total +22.0%, RDVY +22.2%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RDVI costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; RDVI is 4.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QDTE vs RDVI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTERDVI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+22.0%
Price change, 1 yearfell 23.4%rose 12.2%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment40% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQFirst Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, measured through RDVY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.96%0.75%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$869m$3.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · RDVI scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score32.6QDTE92.5RDVI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 137 weekly returns
QDTE RDVI
Return
Total return edge QDTE +58.0% +48.2%
Annualized edge QDTE +19.0% +16.1%
Price return edge RDVI −40.2% +18.0%
Risk
Volatility edge RDVI 17.8% 14.8%
Max drawdown edge RDVI −20.5% −16.4%
Downside capture 91.4% 97.1%
Beta 0.85 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QDTE (slight) 0.83 0.80
Sortino edge QDTE (slight) 1.20 1.16
Treynor 0.172 0.126
Calmar edge RDVI (slight) 0.92 0.98
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.1% a year −0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.37 −0.67
Information ratio −0.22 −0.72
Tracking error 5.7% 1.3%

Each against its own benchmark: QDTE against QQQ, Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; RDVI against RDVY, Oct 28, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Mar 2024 to Oct 2026, QDTE returned more: +58.0% to +48.2%. RDVI swung less: 14.8% to 17.8%. RDVI fell less at its worst: −16.4% to −20.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QDTE vs RDVI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTERDVIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+58.0%+48.2%QDTEPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.0%+16.1%QDTETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−40.2%+18.0%RDVIPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.8%14.8%RDVISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%10.1%RDVILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.5%−16.4%RDVIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture81.9%92.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.4%97.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.850.95Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.930.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.830.80QDTE (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.201.16QDTE (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1720.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.920.98RDVI (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQRDVYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.1% a year−0.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.37−0.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.8% to +7.1%−1.5% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.22−0.72Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.7%1.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 137 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and RDVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QDTE RDVI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QDTE
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 73.55%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.69%
Only in RDVI
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.39%
Accenture plc 2.35%
Visa Inc. (Class A) 2.35%
Veralto Corporation 2.34%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 2.32%
The Allstate Corporation 2.23%
Expedia Group, Inc. 2.17%
Chubb Limited 2.16%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF · Writes calls on the S&P 500, measured against the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index, paying monthly
Strategy 0DTE covered call dividend stocks with call overlay
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 27.9% 8.3%
Expense ratio 0.96% 0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year 34.7% 9.1%
Price change, 1 year −23.4% +12.2%
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +22.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +22.2%
Ahead or behind +1.4 pts −0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 40%
Age 2.7 years 4.0 years
Net assets, QDTE as of Nov 4, 2026 and RDVI as of Nov 3, 2026 $881m $3.9bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QDTE vs RDVI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQDTERDVIQDTERDVIQDTERDVI
3 months−1.6%−1.9%6.3%2.0%+1.8 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+1.6%+7.9%14.3%4.3%+2.0 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+13.7%+22.0%34.7%9.1%+1.5 pts−0.2 pts
3 years–+76.0%–30.9%–−6.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QDTE Mar 2024 · RDVI Oct 2022+55.2%+106.5%75.6%43.0%−2.3 pts−8.4 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QDTE and RDVI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QDTE

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RDVI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDVI paid 9.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.0%. First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) returned +22.2% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or RDVI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 9.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or RDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +13.7% and RDVI +22.0% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or RDVI?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so RDVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QDTE against RDVI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-rdvi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.