Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+10.1 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: XYLG ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.35 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, XYLG 0.35%, per filings dated Feb 26, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

XYLG costs 0.35 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMXYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+13.0%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 0.7% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedS&P 500, measured through SPY
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 1.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.35%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$73m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
12.6%
XYLG cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+13.0%
XYLG total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
XYLG · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 1 pt ahead of SPY
XYLG
+13.0%
SPY
+12.0%

1 pt ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

XYLG

+13.0%

12.6% of it arrived as cash

1 pt ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1 pt ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

XYLG

+13.0%

12.6% cash

1 pt ahead of SPY

12.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Global X
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 4.5%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 12.6%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −0.7%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +13.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.0%
Ahead or behind not available +1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 80%
Age 92 days 6.1 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $73m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMXYLGMPIMXYLGMPIMXYLG
3 months−10.6%−0.5%3.0%1.1%not measured+2.0 pts
6 months–+4.2%–2.5%–+2.5 pts
1 year–+13.0%–12.6%–+1.0 pts
3 years–+62.2%–43.9%–−16.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · XYLG Sep 2020−10.0%+113.5%3.0%69.8%not measured−37.7 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

XYLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

XYLG

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, XYLG paid 12.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or XYLG?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against XYLG, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-xylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and XYLG both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and XYLG

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%XYLG −0.5%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, XYLG −0.5%: XYLG +10.1 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.