Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+12.2 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: XYLD ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.10 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, XYLD 0.60%, per filings dated Feb 26, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

XYLD costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMXYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+14.5%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)rose 3.1% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.60%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
10.6%
XYLD cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+14.5%
XYLD total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
XYLD · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 2.5 pts ahead of SPY
XYLD
+14.5%
SPY
+12.0%

2.5 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +3.1%, total +14.5%, SPY +12.0%, +2.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

XYLD

+14.5%

10.6% of it arrived as cash

2.5 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.5 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +3.1%, total +14.5%, SPY +12.0%, +2.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

XYLD

+14.5%

2.5 pts ahead of SPY

10.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +3.1%, total +14.5%, SPY +12.0%, +2.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Global X
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 9.1%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 10.6%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +3.1%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +14.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.0%
Ahead or behind not available +2.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 93%
Age 92 days 13.4 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $3.4bn

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMXYLDMPIMXYLDMPIMXYLD
3 months−10.6%+1.6%3.0%2.2%not measured+4.0 pts
6 months–+7.0%–5.1%–+5.3 pts
1 year–+14.5%–10.6%–+2.5 pts
3 years–+47.0%–33.9%–−31.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · XYLD Jun 2013−10.0%+193.1%3.0%114.5%not measured−310.1 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

XYLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

XYLD

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, XYLD paid 10.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.5 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or XYLD?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against XYLD, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-xyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and XYLD both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and XYLD

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%XYLD +1.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, XYLD +1.6%: XYLD +12.2 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.