Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs SCEP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+9.0 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: SCEP ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.05 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, SCEP 0.65%, per filings dated Dec 8, 2025 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

SCEP costs 0.05 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs SCEP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMSCEP
Paid and earned
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 1.4% (6 months)
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedits own stocks
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 0.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.65%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$235m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
6.1%
SCEP cash paid, since launch, Dec 11, 2025
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+5.4%
SCEP total return, since launch, Dec 11, 2025
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SCEP · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
SCEP
+5.4%
none

Not measured

SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −0.9%, total +5.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SCEP

+5.4%

6.1% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −0.9%, total +5.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SCEP

+5.4%

6.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCEP since launch: paid 6.1%, price −0.9%, total +5.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable SCEP STERLING CAPITAL HEDGED EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF · Covered call on its own stocks, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set SCEP's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 7.0%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 6.1% (since launch, Dec 11, 2025)
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −0.9% (since launch, Dec 11, 2025)
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +5.4% (since launch, Dec 11, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published not published
Ahead or behind not available not available
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 92 days 336 days
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $235m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs SCEP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMSCEPMPIMSCEPMPIMSCEP
3 months−10.6%−1.6%3.0%1.7%not measured+0.6 pts
6 months–+2.1%–3.5%–+0.6 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · SCEP Dec 2025−10.0%+5.4%3.0%6.1%not measurednot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

SCEP

SCEP's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026) returned +1.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts.

Over the 6 months to Nov 12, 2026, SCEP paid 3.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly. Sterling Capital estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or SCEP?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and SCEP charges 0.65%, so SCEP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against SCEP, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-scep

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and SCEP both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and SCEP

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%SCEP −1.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, SCEP −1.6%: SCEP +9.0 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.