Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+12.1 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: QYLD ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.10 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, QYLD 0.60%, per filings dated Feb 26, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

QYLD costs 0.10 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMQYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+15.4%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)rose 2.4% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.60%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$8.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
12.2%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+15.4%
QYLD total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
QYLD · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 4.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+15.4%
QQQ
+11.3%

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +2.4%, total +15.4%, QQQ +11.3%, +4.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QYLD

+15.4%

12.2% of it arrived as cash

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +2.4%, total +15.4%, QQQ +11.3%, +4.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QYLD

+15.4%

4.1 pts ahead of QQQ

12.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.2%, price +2.4%, total +15.4%, QQQ +11.3%, +4.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Global X
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 12.2%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 12.2%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +2.4%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +15.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +11.3%
Ahead or behind not available +4.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 99%
Age 92 days 12.9 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $8.2bn

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMQYLDMPIMQYLDMPIMQYLD
3 months−10.6%+1.5%3.0%3.0%not measured+7.4 pts
6 months–+4.9%–6.0%–+9.1 pts
1 year–+15.4%–12.2%–+4.1 pts
3 years–+51.5%–37.8%–−34.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · QYLD Dec 2013−10.0%+193.8%3.0%117.5%not measured−606.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QYLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

QYLD

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QYLD paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or QYLD?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against QYLD, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and QYLD both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and QYLD

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%QYLD +1.5%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, QYLD +1.5%: QYLD +12.1 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.